Gianmaria Salvio, Alessandro Ciarloni, Claudio Gianfelice, Francesca Lacchè, Sofia Sabatelli, Gilberta Giacchetti, Giancarlo Balercia
Journal: Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 2023;12(10):1830
PMID: 37891909
Women who are post-menopause are at a higher risk of osteoporosis due to lower levels of the hormone oestrogen. Oestrogens promote bone building and limit breakdown. In addition, oestrogen protects the bones against oxidative stress, which can cause further bone breakdown. Polyphenols, which are naturally occurring chemicals found in fruits and vegetables, may prevent oxidative stress and subsequent bone breakdown. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomised control trials aimed to determine the effect of polyphenol supplementation on post-menopausal bone density. The results showed that polyphenol supplementation had no effect on bone density in the spine, leg, hip, or across the whole body. If polyphenol supplementation extended beyond 2 years, there was evidence of an improvement in spinal bone density. Supplementation also increased one biomarker associated with bone building and decrease one associated with its breakdown. It was concluded that polyphenol use is not recommended to improve bone health in postmenopausal women. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand polyphenol supplementation is ineffective for the prevention of osteoporosis and other lifestyle modifications should be considered.
None

Osteoporosis is a condition favored by the postmenopausal decline in estrogen levels and worsened by oxidative stress (OS). Polyphenols are natural compounds abundantly found in fruits and vegetables, and they exert antioxidant and hormonal effects that could be useful in osteoporosis prevention, as suggested by epidemiological studies showing a lower incidence of fractures in individuals consuming polyphenol-rich diets. The aim of our meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects of polyphenols on bone mineral density (BMD, primary endpoint) and bone turnover markers (BTMs, secondary endpoint) in postmenopausal women. Twenty-one randomized control trials (RCTs) were included in our analysis after in-depth search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. We found that supplementation with polyphenols for 3-36 months exerted no statically significant effects on BMD measured at lumbar spine (sMD: 0.21, 95% CI [-0.08 to 0.51], = 0.16), femoral neck (sMD: 0.16, 95% CI [-0.23 to 0.55], = 0.42), total hip (sMD: 0.05, 95% CI [-0.14 to 0.24], = 0.61), and whole body (sMD: -0.12, 95% CI [-0.42 to 0.17], = 0.41). Subgroup analysis based on treatment duration showed no statistical significance, but a significant effect on lumbar BMD emerged when studies with duration of 24 months or greater were analyzed separately. On the other hand, we found a significantly slight increase in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) levels (sMD: 1.27, 95% CI [1.13 to 1.42], < 0.0001) and a decrease in pyridinoline (PD) levels (sMD: -0.58, 95% CI [-0.77 to -0.39], < 0.0001). High heterogeneity among studies and unclear risk of bias in one third of the included studies emerged. A subgroup analysis showed similar effects for different duration of treatment and models of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. More robust evidence is needed before recommending the prescription of polyphenols in clinical practice.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.