A B Johan Groeneveld, Pieter M Ter Wee, Marc G Vervloet, S Azam Nurmohamed, Armand R J Girbes
Journal: Blood purification 2007;25(4):316-23
PMID: 17700015
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) requires anticoagulation to prevent circuit clotting and its use is contraindicated in patients with high bleeding risk. The aim of this study was to compare CVVH with and without regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) with respect to filter life, azotemic control and cost.
METHODS
This was a prospective sequential cohort study. The first cohort of patients with a high bleeding risk and acute renal failure was treated by anticoagulant-free predilution CVVH (n = 31). In the second cohort, CVVH was applied with RCA (n = 20).
RESULTS
The median filter life was 41 h (interquartile range 20-62) with RCA and 12 h (8-28) without RCA (p = 0.001). The azotemic control was better in the group with RCA. The hourly cost was comparable between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
Regional anticoagulation with citrate-based replacement solution improved filter life compared to anticoagulant-free predilution CVVH. This regimen appeared safe, feasible and without metabolic complications or increased costs.
Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Medical:
Other Literature Sources:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.