A randomised controlled trial to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a small change approach to prevent weight gain.

Henrietta Graham, Claire Madigan, Amanda J Daley

Journal: Journal of behavioral medicine 2024;47(2):232-243

PMID: 37932643

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

A large percentage of the global population are living with overweight or obesity and are at increased risk of developing several chronic illnesses. The weight gain prevention strategy known as the small change approach, involves minor adjustments in energy expenditure and intake. This approach has shown promise in intensive interventions but has not been widely tested for large-scale application. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a remote small change weight gain prevention intervention over a 12-week period. This study was an individual two arm feasibility randomised controlled trial, with a nested qualitative study. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group – receiving generic information about how to lead a healthy lifestyle or the intervention group - a small change approach intervention. Results showed that recruitment and retention criteria were met (green light), but adherence to the intervention was lower than expected (red light). Despite this, 62% of participants found the small change approach helpful for weight management, and the intervention group experienced a mean weight difference of -1.1 kg compared to the control group. Authors concluded that, excluding intervention adherence, the small change approach was feasible and acceptable to participants. The approach was useful for weight management, with the intervention group gaining less weight than the control group. The authors suggest that with improvements to increase adherence, the approach could progress to an effective trial.

Expert Review

Reviewer: Nicky Ester
17th Oct 2024
plain language summary logo

Conflict of interest

None

Take home message

  • A key take home message is that through small changes it is possible to prevent weight gain, which could be seen as a more attainable and positive goal than focussing on weight loss.
  • Often individuals find it hard to make changes on their own, since this study was delivered remotely it could help to encourage people wanting to improve their health to use online resources and apps for motivation and guidance.

Evidence category

A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)

Summary review

Introduction

  • To explore strategies for addressing the global obesity crisis, this feasibility trial aimed to determine whether small, incremental reductions in calorie intake alongside gentle increases in energy expenditure, could promote weight loss over time.
  • Unlike earlier studies, this approach was intentionally designed without post-intervention support to assess whether participants could achieve weight loss independently.
  • If successful, this would demonstrate the potential for the method to be implemented effectively in broader public health initiatives.

Methods

  • The study was a randomised controlled trial. Participants were aged ≥ 18 with a Body Mass Index between 20 and 30kg/m2.
  • The intervention lasted 12 weeks and participants were encouraged to make 1 small change each day to decrease calorie intake or increase energy expenditure by 100-200 kcal a day.
  • The program was delivered remotely with an initial 10-minute video followed by 33 texts over the period – encouraging self-regulation, being motivational or collecting adherence data.
  • A total of 122 participants were recruited, with 80 randomly assigned to the intervention group and 42 to the control group

Results

  • The primary feasibility and acceptability outcomes, assessed by recruitment (122), retention (91%) and adherence (<60%) showed that intervention is feasible and acceptable.
  • One primary outcome of the study was that 62% of the intervention group reported the small change approach as helpful.
  • The intervention group lost significantly more weight than the control group- 1.1kg (95% CI: -1.7 to -0.4).
  • The intervention group had favourable mean difference scores for cognitive restraint of eating (1.6, 95% CI: 0.5 – 2.8) and self-regulation (5.0, 95% CI: 0.8 – 9.3).
  • Self-efficacy for dietary behaviour and physical activity were the same for both groups.

Conclusion

  • The results of this randomised controlled trial suggest that a small change approach may be an effective, sustainable strategy for preventing weight gain.
  • The approach's feasibility and acceptability highlight its potential for broader public health application, as a scalable intervention to combat the obesity epidemic.
  • Future research should explore long-term effects of this approach and its effectiveness in diverse populations.

Clinical practice applications

  • These findings suggest that small, consistent changes, combined with digital support tools and a focus on self-regulation, can be effective strategies for preventing weight gain in clinical and nutritional settings.
  • Incorporating self-regulation techniques into client consultations, like goal setting and self-monitoring could improve results in managing diet and physical activity.
  • Promoting gradual daily changes to diet and physical exercise is an effective strategy to help adherence to health programmes.

Considerations for future research

  • The participants of the study were mainly white females, and this may have impacted results, Future studies would be advised to recruit a more diverse sample group.
  • To increase the success of any potential public health programmes, follow up studies could benefit on making changes to those aspects of the intervention which participants reported as not finding as helpful.
  • Changes in behaviour were self-reported, processes to gain real time results, whilst not adding additional support to participants might be a consideration to ensure more accurate reporting.
  • Review the method for assessing adherence to understand if additional measures are required e.g. gamification or support.
plain language summary logo
Expert reviews are written by nutrition professionals and academics with advanced qualifications to provide a critical appraisal of the article and implications for practice. Each review is peer-reviewed by a member of the NED Editorial Board. Find out more about our NED Expert Reviewers here.

Abstract

A weight gain prevention strategy showing merit is a small change approach (increase energy expenditure and/or decrease energy intake by 100-200 kcal/day). Studies have tested a small change approach in intensive interventions involving multiple contacts, unsuitable for delivery at scale. The aim here was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a remote small change weight gain prevention intervention. A randomised controlled trial of 122 participants was conducted. The intervention was a remote 12-week small change weight gain prevention programme (targeting dietary and/or physical activity behaviours). The comparator group received a healthy lifestyle leaflet. Data were collected at baseline and 12-weeks. The primary outcome was the feasibility and acceptability, assessed against three stop-go traffic light criteria: retention, number of participants randomised per month and adherence to a small change approach. Participants' opinions of a small change approach and weight change were also measured. The traffic light stop-go criteria results were green for recruitment (122 participants recruited in three months) and retention (91%) and red for intervention adherence. Most participants (62%) found a small change approach helpful for weight management and the mean difference in weight was - 1.1 kg (95% CI - 1.7, - 0.4), favouring the intervention group. Excluding intervention adherence, the trial was feasible and acceptable to participants. Despite adherence being lower than expected, participants found a small change approach useful for weight management and gained less weight than comparators. With refinement to increase intervention adherence, progress to an effectiveness trial is warranted.ISRCTN18309466: 12/04/2022 (retrospectively registered).

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: The Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLIMB), School of Sport Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK. [email protected].; The Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLIMB), School of Sport Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.

Patient Centred Factor

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.