Dopamine agonist serum concentrations and impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease.

Sara C Staubo, Ole Martin Fuskevåg, Mathias Toft, Ingeborg H Lie, Kirsti M J Alvik, Pål Jostad, Stein H Tingvoll, Hallvard Lilleng, Kristina Rosqvist, Elisabet Størset, Per Odin, Espen Dietrichs, Erik Sveberg Dietrichs

Journal: European journal of neurology 2024;31(2):e16144

PMID: 37955562

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Impulse control disorders (ICDs) are common among Parkinson's disease patients using dopamine agonists. We wanted to determine whether ICD patients have higher dopamine agonist serum concentrations than those without any sign of ICD.

METHODS

Patients who used either pramipexole or ropinirole depot once daily were screened for ICDs using the validated Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale. Those who scored above the cut-off for one or more of the four defined ICDs (gambling, compulsive sexual behavior, compulsive shopping, and binge-eating) were compared in a case-control study to patients who scored zero points (no evidence of ICD) on the same items. They were examined clinically and evaluated using relevant scales. Three blood samples were taken on the same day: before daily dose, and then 6 and 12 h later.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included: 19 ICD-positive and 27 controls. Ropinirole serum concentrations 6 h after daily intake (C ) were higher in the case group compared to the control group, as was the daily ropinirole dosage. No differences were observed in serum concentrations, dosage or total drug exposure for pramipexole. Disease duration and length of dopamine agonist treatment was significantly longer among ICD patients for ropinirole, but not for pramipexole.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of pramipexole may in itself confer high ICD risk, whereas ICDs among ropinirole users depend more on serum concentration and drug exposure. The pharmacokinetic properties of ropinirole make it challenging to predict its effects on patients, which supports the need for therapeutic drug monitoring to reduce risk of ICD.

© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.

Address: Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.; Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.; Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Medical Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Services, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.; Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.; Unicare Fram Rehabilitation Centre, Rykkinn, Norway.; Ringen Rehabilitation Centre, Moelv, Norway.; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.; Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.; Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.; Institute of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.