F Homann, J N Waddell, M V Swain
Journal: Journal of dentistry 2006;34(7):485-90
PMID: 16387405
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to measure the influence of water on the adhesion between titanium and porcelain by means of the strain energy release rate (G-value or interfacial toughness).
METHODS
Rectangular specimens of grade II titanium and a reference gold-palladium porcelain fused to metal (PFM) alloy were veneered with feldspathic porcelains. In the case of the titanium, two gold and one ceramic bonder systems were used to enhance the adhesion of the porcelain. The G-value was measured with a four-point bending configuration developed by Charalambides et al. (Journal of Applied Mechanics (Trans ASME). 1989;56:77-82), at four different loading rates (from 0.1 to 15 N/s) in water and at one loading rate (1.5 N/s) in kerosine.
RESULTS
There was a significant difference (ANOVA, p<0.01) in the interfacial toughness between the different bonding systems, with the two goldbonder systems exhibiting higher toughness in kerosine and water than the ceramic bonder. The two goldbonders achieved the best results across all loading rates. Their interfacial toughness, tested in kerosine, varied between 45.83+/-6.72 and 73.54+/-17.01 J/m(2) and tested in water from 40.86+/-2.23 to 69.17+/-12.33 J/m(2), respectively. The ceramic Ti bonder achieved the lowest G-values throughout (30.15+/-5.52 J/m(2) in kerosine to 11.08+/-2.18 J/m(2) in water). The gold-palladium PFM alloy showed more constant behaviour (33.48+/-2.24 J/m(2) to 23.07+/-0.53 J/m(2) in kerosine and water, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Compared to the gold-palladium PFM alloy, the goldbonders achieved much higher G-values whereas the ceramic Ti bonder G-values were lower when tested in water and in kerosine.
Miscellaneous:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.