A randomized crossover study of secretin-stimulated endoscopic and dreiling tube pancreatic function test methods in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES

We have developed an endoscopic method of secretin endoscopic pancreatic function testing (ePFT) to simplify duodenal fluid collection. Validation of the ePFT requires a direct comparison to the traditional PFT using a Dreiling tube (DT). Our aim was to compare bicarbonate concentrations [HCO3-] obtained by the ePFT and DT methods in healthy subjects (HS).

METHODS

HS were randomized to either DT or ePFT, then crossed over to the other test after a minimum 1-wk washout. An age/weight-based sedation bolus was used for each test. DT protocol: Endoscopic placement of a DT was confirmed by fluoroscopy. After a baseline 15-min collection and administration of IV synthetic secretin, fluid was continuously collected in 15-min aliquots for an hour. ePFT protocol: Endoscopy was performed using a 6-mm endoscope. After gastric aspiration and discard and IV secretin, duodenal aspirates were obtained every 15-min for an hour. Fluid specimens were auto-analyzed for [HCO3-].

RESULTS

Twelve HS were enrolled (6F, mean age 37 yr). The difference in [HCO3-] between the two methods was not significant at the 0-, 30-, 45-, or 60-min collections. An excellent correlation in peak [HCO3-] was observed (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.001). Using a peak [HCO3-] cutpoint 80 mEq/L, there was 100% agreement between the methods; using cutpoint 90 mEq/L, there was 83% agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of the ePFT is similar to DT: There were minimal differences in [HCO3-] at each of the timed collections and at peak. There is an excellent correlation in peak [HCO3-] and high level of diagnostic agreement between the tests.