Physiologically engineered porous titanium/brushite scaffolds for critical-size bone defects: A design and manufacturing study.

Dina Abdulaziz, Antonios D Anastasiou, Vasiliki Panagiotopoulou, El Mostafa Raif, Peter V Giannoudis, Animesh Jha

Journal: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2023;148():106223

PMID: 37976684

Abstract

Repairing critical-size bone defects still represents a critical clinical challenge in the field of trauma surgery. This study focuses on a physiological design and manufacturing of porous composite scaffold (titanium Ti with 10 % mole iron doped brushite DCPD-Fe) which can mimic the biomechanical properties of natural cortical bone, specifically for the purpose of repairing critical-size defects. To achieve this, the principle of design of experiments (DOE) was applied for investigating the impact of sintering temperature, mineral ratio, and volume fraction of porosity on the mechanical properties of the fabricated scaffolds. The fabricated scaffolds had open porosity up to 60 %, with pore size approximately between 100 μm and 850 μm. The stiffness of the porous composite scaffolds varied between 3.30 GPa and 20.50 GPa, while the compressive strength ranged from approximately 130 MPa-165 MPa at sintering temperatures equal to or exceeding 1000 °C. Scaffolds with higher porosity and mineral content demonstrated lower stiffness values, resembling natural bone. Numerical simulation was employed by Ansys Workbench to investigate the stress and strain distribution of a critical size defect in mid-shaft femur which was designed to be replaced with the fabricated scaffold. The fabricated scaffolds showed flexible biomechanical behaviour at the bone/scaffold interface, generating lower stress levels and indicating a better match with the femoral shaft stiffness. The experimental and numerical findings demonstrated promising applications for manufacturing a patient-specific bone scaffold for critical and potentially large defects for reducing stress shielding and minimizing non-union risk.

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Address: School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 3AL, UK.; Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems and Automation, University of Patras, 26504, Greece.; Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.; Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.; School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.