Allen J Dietrich, Thomas E Oxman, John W Williams, Herbert C Schulberg, Martha L Bruce, Pamela W Lee, Sheila Barry, Patrick J Raue, Jean J Lefever, Moonseong Heo, Kathryn Rost, Kurt Kroenke, Martha Gerrity, Paul A Nutting
Journal: BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2004;329(7466):602
PMID: 15345600
OBJECTIVE
To test the effectiveness of an evidence based model for management of depression in primary care with support from quality improvement resources.
DESIGN
Cluster randomised controlled trial.
SETTING
Five healthcare organisations in the United States and 60 affiliated practices.
PATIENTS
405 patients, aged > or = 18 years, starting or changing treatment for depression.
INTERVENTION
Care provided by clinicians, with staff providing telephone support under supervision from a psychiatrist.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Severity of depression at three and six months (Hopkins symptom checklist-20): response to treatment (> or = 50% decrease in scores) and remission (score of < 0.5).
RESULTS
At six months, 60% (106 of 177) of patients in intervention practices had responded to treatment compared with 47% (68 of 146) of patients in usual care practices (P = 0.02). At six months, 37% of intervention patients showed remission compared with 27% for usual care patients (P = 0.014). 90% of intervention patients rated their depression care as good or excellent at six months compared with 75% of usual care patients (P = 0.0003).
CONCLUSION
Resources such as quality improvement programmes can be used effectively in primary care to implement evidence based management of depression and improve outcomes for patients with depression.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.