An improved model for the measurement of myocardial perfusion in human beings using N-13 ammonia.

Kathleen T Hickey, Robert R Sciacca, Ru-Ling Chou, Oswaldo Rodriguez, Sabahat Bokhari, Steven R Bergmann

Journal: Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2005;12(3):311-7

PMID: 15944536

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oxygen 15 water and nitrogen 13 ammonia are widely used for the quantitative measurement of myocardial perfusion with positron emission tomography. However, blood flow obtained with N-13 ammonia by use of the conventional 2-compartment model frequently underestimates flow by 30% to 50% compared with O-15 water. We hypothesized that this discrepancy is a result of the model configuration of N-13 ammonia and investigated changes to the mathematical model to determine whether more accurate measurements of perfusion could be obtained.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve healthy volunteers were sequentially studied with O-15 water and N-13 ammonia at rest and during maximal coronary vasodilation with adenosine. Perfusion measurements obtained with the conventional and modified models were compared with values obtained with O-15 water. The conventional N-13 ammonia model underestimated flow by 37% +/- 16% at rest and by 20% +/- 24% with stress when compared with flows obtained with O-15 water. The modified model yielded flow values closer to the line of identity than the conventional model (y = 1.07x + 0.04 vs y = 0.69x + 0.08; respectively; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Model changes made N-13 ammonia myocardial blood flow estimates more comparable to those obtained with O-15 and may allow for better comparison of flows obtained with these two tracers in the future. Further efforts are warranted to evaluate the accuracy of flow models in human subjects.

Address: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, College of Physicians & Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. [email protected]

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.