Prognostic and clinicopathological effect of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have explored whether the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) can predict the prognosis of cervical cancer (CC); however, their findings remain controversial. This meta-analysis focused on evaluating the relationship between the PNI and the prognosis of patients with CC.

METHODS

Relevant articles were collected from specific databases up to March 16, 2023. The relationship between the PNI and survival outcomes in patients with CC was estimated using combined hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The association of the PNI with clinicopathological features in patients with CC was assessed by combining odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Nine articles with 2508 cases were included in the meta-analysis. According to our pooled findings, a decreased PNI showed a significant association with worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.98, 95% CI = 2.22-3.99,  < .001) as well as progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.92-3.07,  < .001) in patients with CC. The subgroup analysis indicated that the results were reliable. Moreover, the decreased PNI showed a significant association with the presence of lymph node metastasis (LN metastasis, OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.04-82.24,  = .030) and maximum tumor size >4 cm (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.21-2.46,  = .002). However, the PNI was not significantly associated with histology, differentiation, or FIGO stage.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a low PNI predicted dismal OS and PFS in patients with CC, who also tend to suffer from LN metastasis and larger tumor size. PNI is a promising biomarker for predicting the prognosis of patients with CC in clinical practice.