Assessment of interobserver reliability in nutrition studies that use direct observation of school meals.

Michelle L Baglio, Suzanne Domel Baxter, Caroline H Guinn, William O Thompson, Nicole M Shaffer, Francesca H A Frye

Journal: Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2004;104(9):1385-92

PMID: 15354155

Abstract

This article (a) provides a general review of interobserver reliability (IOR) and (b) describes our method for assessing IOR for items and amounts consumed during school meals for a series of studies regarding the accuracy of fourth-grade children's dietary recalls validated with direct observation of school meals. A widely used validation method for dietary assessment is direct observation of meals. Although many studies utilize several people to conduct direct observations, few published studies indicate whether IOR was assessed. Assessment of IOR is necessary to determine that the information collected does not depend on who conducted the observation. Two strengths of our method for assessing IOR are that IOR was assessed regularly throughout the data collection period and that IOR was assessed for foods at the item and amount level instead of at the nutrient level. Adequate agreement among observers is essential to the reasoning behind using observation as a validation tool. Readers are encouraged to question the results of studies that fail to mention and/or to include the results for assessment of IOR when multiple people have conducted observations.

Address: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities, University of South Carolina, 220 Stoneridge Drive, Columbia, SC 29210, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.