A double-blind study comparing 0.5% and 1% tropicamide for annual retinal screening in diabetic adolescents.

J Hassler-Hurst, C Wadham, G Rayman

Journal: Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association 2004;21(5):434-9

PMID: 15089787

Abstract

AIMS

To determine whether there is any difference between 0.5% and 1% tropicamide in ocular discomfort and mydriatic efficacy in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

In a double-blind study, one drop of 0.5% tropicamide was instilled in one eye and one drop of 1% instilled in the other eye of 30 subjects aged 12-18 years. Drop strengths were randomized. Pupil size was measured before instillation, at 10, 20 and 30 min. Discomfort was measured using a recognized pain scale.

RESULTS

Irrespective of the concentration of tropicamide used, all pupils dilated to at least 6 mm at 30 min, sufficient for successful ophthalmoscopy. Pain was significantly less when the lower concentration of tropicamide was used; pain score for the 0.5% group [median (interquartile range)] 1.0 (0-2) and 2.0 (1-3) for the 1.0% group, P = 0.009 (Wilcoxon rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

This minor change in practice significantly reduces the distress associated with drop instillation without compromising the clinical examination, and may thus be important in encouraging compliance at the yearly diabetic review.

Address: Diabetes Centre, Children and Young Adults Team, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD. UK.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.