Comparison of the effects of calcium loading with calcium citrate or calcium carbonate on bone turnover in postmenopausal women.

Anne M Kenny, Karen M Prestwood, Bradley Biskup, Bertha Robbins, Enid Zayas, Alison Kleppinger, Joseph A Burleson, Lawrence G Raisz

Journal: Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2004;15(4):290-4

PMID: 14722627

Abstract

Calcium supplementation is known to increase bone mineral density and decrease fractures, but the relative efficacy of different forms of calcium supplementation is not established. We compared the effects of calcium carbonate and calcium citrate on markers of bone resorption in older postmenopausal women in an open-labeled crossover study. Forty women were randomized to receive 1000 mg/day of either calcium citrate or calcium carbonate for 12 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout without calcium supplements and 12 weeks treatment with the alternate calcium supplement. All women received vitamin D (900 IU/day). Thirty-four women (25 Caucasian, nine Hispanic) completed the study. No significant differences in the decrease in parathyroid hormone (PTH) or bone specific alkaline phosphatase or the increase in urinary calcium/creatinine were detected between the two treatments. However, calcium citrate supplementation decreased the collagen cross-link resorption markers, urinary N-telopeptide (-30%), C-telopeptide (-31%), free deoxypyridinoline (19%) and serum N-telopeptide (-8%), compared to no significant change following calcium carbonate supplementation (+2%, +3%, +2% and +2%, respectively; P<0.05). Calcium citrate decreased markers of bone resorption significantly more than calcium carbonate in postmenopausal women, although no differences in their effects in calcium excretion or PTH were detected.

Address: Center on Aging, MC-5215, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-5215, USA. [email protected]
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.