Beyond UV: Visible Light and Pigmentation.

Edric Ip, Thierry Passeron, Michelle Rodrigues

Journal: Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine 2026;42(5):e70125

PMID: 42802407

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) are common dermatologic conditions disproportionately affecting individuals with darker skin phototypes, carrying substantial psychosocial burden and reduced quality of life. Emerging evidence increasingly implicates visible light (VL), particularly high energy visible (HEV) light, as a significant but underappreciated driver of disease appearance and progression.

AIMS AND METHODS

This narrative review integrates mechanistic and clinical evidence to examine VL's pathogenic role in melasma and PIH, synthesising data on opsin-mediated melanocyte activation, clinical trial outcomes of VL protective interventions and patient adherence barriers to photoprotection strategies.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

HEV (400-450 nm) activates opsin-3 on melanocytes, triggering calcium-dependent signaling that increases melanogenesis in a wavelength-specific manner. Clinical studies confirm that blue-violet light induces dose-dependent hyperpigmentation whereas red light produces none. Notably, pigmentation induced by high-energy visible (HEV) light can be substantial and persist over time. Protection against VL significantly enhances melasma treatment outcomes: melasma patients using iron oxide-containing sunscreen achieved 15% greater Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) improvement, 28% greater lightening on colorimetry and 4% greater histologic reduction in melanin than patients using an otherwise similar UV-only sunscreen. VL also seems to be involved in PIH, as suggested by a suction blister PIH model in which light-blocked sites healed without hyperpigmentation by Day 29, unlike ambient light-exposed sites that showed colorimetric and histologic darkening. Adherence to photoprotection in general remains suboptimal. Fewer than two-thirds of patients with hyperpigmentation use sunscreen and fewer than 10% reapply appropriately, with worse habits observed in skin of color, the population at greatest risk. Shade incompatibility of tinted formulations represents a key additional barrier to the use of VL-specific photoprotection.

CONCLUSION

This review establishes VL as a clinically significant driver of melasma and PIH pathogenesis. Standardising VL photoprotection metrics and integrating these into sunscreen development is essential. Incorporating VL protective strategies into treatment recommendations is critical to improving outcomes, particularly in darker skin individuals where disease burden is greatest and treatment most challenging.

© 2026 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Department of Dermatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.; Côte D'azur University, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.; Chroma Dermatology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Department of Dermatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.