Physiotherapy in Mental Health: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Practitioner and Student Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions.

Farahdina Bachtiar, Chiara Mastrogiovanni, Grace McKeon, Davy Vancampfort, Holly Seale, Dicky C Pelupessy, Afsana Anwar, Hilmi Zadah Faidullah, Brendon Stubbs, Simon Rosenbaum

Journal: Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy 2026;31(4):e70329

PMID: 42634928

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mental health physiotherapy is increasingly recognised as a specialised area of practice. Adequate knowledge and positive attitudes are essential for ensuring safe evidence-based care and for directly influencing the quality of services delivered. Despite this, research on mental health literacy and attitudes within physiotherapy remains fragmented. This study aims to synthesise evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of physiotherapists and physiotherapy students regarding roles in mental health practice.

METHODS

A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024611691). An initial search of Embase (via Ovid), PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL and Google Scholar was performed from inception to November 2024, followed by an updated search of the same databases in January 2026. Empirical studies examining knowledge, attitudes or perceptions related to mental health were included. Study quality was appraised using the mixed method appraisal tool (MMAT). Findings were synthesised narratively for quantitative data and thematically for qualitative data, with integration through a convergent segregated approach.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies were included, comprising 2780 physiotherapists and 2715 students. Participants generally demonstrated positive attitudes towards people with mental illness, whereas reported mental health knowledge varied from limited to good across studies and populations. Experiential learning through direct client interaction appeared to be associated with a more integrated understanding of mental health in physiotherapy and greater confidence, comfort, empathy and reflective capacity. However, the included studies were methodologically heterogeneous, and psychometric properties of the assessment instruments were often insufficiently documented.

DISCUSSION

Participants recognised the importance of mental health support and held positive attitudes, but may not have been prepared to address mental health concerns in physiotherapy practice. Limited education, clinical exposure and role clarity may have contributed to this lack of readiness. These findings support the consideration of more targeted mental health education and structured training initiatives.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol for this review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024611691).

© 2026 The Author(s). Physiotherapy Research International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Nutrition, Exercise & Social Equity (NExuS) Research Group, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.; Department of Physiotherapy, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Depok, Jakarta, Indonesia.; Nutrition, Exercise & Social Equity (NExuS) Research Group, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.; Nutrition, Exercise & Social Equity (NExuS) Research Group, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.; Institute of Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.; Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.; Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Sleman Regency, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia.; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; Department of Sport and Human Movement Science, Centre for Sport Science and University Sports, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.