Contrasting Hydraulic-Photosynthetic Strategies Sustain Antarctic Vascular Plants Under Long-Term Warming.

Valentina Vallejos, Domingo Sancho-Knapik, Constanza F Ramírez, Lohengrin A Cavieres, León A Bravo, José Javier Peguero-Pina, Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrín, Jeroni Galmés, Patricia L Sáez

Journal: Physiologia plantarum 2026;178(4):e71079

PMID: 42629582

Abstract

Leaf hydraulics and their coordination with photosynthesis are central to maintaining plant physiological function, especially in plants inhabiting extreme environments. We investigated the hydraulic responses of the only two vascular plant species native to Antarctica, Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis, to long-term in situ warming imposed by open-top chambers (OTCs), and assessed how these responses covary with photosynthesis (AN). After 7 years under OTC, D. antarctica reduced both leaf hydraulic conductivity (Kleaf) and AN when compared with plants under natural conditions (OA), whereas C. quitensis increased both. A tight coordination between hydraulics and photosynthesis emerged in both species, supported by structural and ultrastructural leaf adjustments. In D. antarctica, reductions in Kleaf and AN could be linked to outside-xylem modulation and likely to senescence triggered by more frequent freeze-thaw events inside OTCs, where time below 0°C increased nearly tenfold compared with OA (from 32 to 309 h). Conversely, C. quitensis displayed increased cell wall elasticity, enhanced water transport and CO2 diffusion, triggered by changes in vascular anatomy, and the growth form that favors heat conservation. These results highlight that the two Antarctic vascular species represent complementary adaptive pathways to environmental change, illustrating two sides of a common adaptive continuum, balancing hydraulic safety and efficiency, stability and plasticity, critical for survival in one of the most stressful environments on Earth.

© 2026 Scandinavian Plant Physiology Society.

Address: Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco, Chile.; Departamento de Sistemas Agrícolas, Forestales y Medio Ambiente, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Zaragoza, España.; Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular Vegetal, Instituto de Agroindustria, Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.; Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad-IEB, Concepción, Chile.; Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad-IEB, Concepción, Chile.; ECOBIOSIS, Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.; Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular Vegetal, Instituto de Agroindustria, Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.; Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEAD-CSIC), Zaragoza, España.; Research Group on Plant Biology Under Mediterranean Conditions, INAGEA-Universitat de Les Illes Balears, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.