Mehul A Shah, Shreya M Shah, Riddhi Shah, Nikita Balani, Ritu Manwani, Nikhil Adroja
Journal: Indian journal of ophthalmology 2026;74(7):1062-1066
PMID: 42378082
BACKGROUND
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has revolutionized the evaluation of retinal microvasculature by enabling noninvasive quantification of capillary networks and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is associated with progressive microvascular rarefaction, but the effect of lens status on OCTA-derived vascular metrics remains underexplored.
METHODS
In this prospective observational study, 107 diabetic eyes imaged between March and August 2025 at Drashti Netralaya underwent high-resolution OCTA using the Heidelberg Spectralis platform. OCTEVA software enabled automated segmentation of the superficial (SCP), intermediate (ICP), and deep capillary plexuses (DCP). Quantitative measurements included vessel area density, branchpoint density, fractal dimension, and FAZ area. Lens status was classified as phakic or pseudophakic. Between-group comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests with Holm correction for multiple comparisons, and Cohen's d was calculated for effect size.
RESULTS
Pseudophakic eyes exhibited significantly reduced vascular density (SCP: 44.7 ± 6.2% vs 48.5 ± 5.9%, P = 0.004; ICP: 33.8 ± 4.5% vs 36.7 ± 4.3%, P = 0.008; DCP: 34.2 ± 4.9% vs 37.9 ± 5.1%, P = 0.005) and lower fractal dimension (SCP: 1.39 ± 0.06 vs 1.42 ± 0.05, P = 0.011). FAZ area was significantly larger in pseudophakic eyes (0.37 ± 0.09 mm² vs 0.32 ± 0.08 mm², P = 0.018). Central macular thickness was slightly increased in pseudophakic eyes but not statistically significant (P = 0.07).
CONCLUSION
Pseudophakic eyes demonstrate measurable microvascular compromise and FAZ enlargement compared with phakic eyes, reflecting advanced diabetic disease burden. Lens status should be considered when interpreting OCTA biomarkers in DR research and clinical assessment.
Copyright © 2026 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.