Irreversible electroporation combined with immunotherapy versus irreversible electroporation alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Miriana Mariussi, Laura Costa de Oliveira Lima, Mariano Gallo Ruelas, Victor Arthur Ohannesian, Bruno Murad, Guilherme Strieder de Oliveira, Luiza Giuliani Schmitt, Giovanni Brondani Torri, Stephan Altmayer, Priscila Mina Falsarella, Pedro Luiz Serrano Usón Junior, Rodrigo Gobbo Garcia

Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2026;24():eRW1656

PMID: 42054172

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of percutaneous irreversible electroporation combined with immunotherapy compared with irreversible electroporation alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We systematically searched Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed/Medline for relevant studies. The outcomes of interest were progression-free survival, overall survival, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels, and adverse events. Progression-free survival and overall survival were assessed using pooled hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR) were used for adverse events, and mean differences (MD) for CA 19-9.

RESULTS

Four studies involving 310 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Irreversible electroporation combined with immunotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with irreversible electroporation alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95%CI=0.39 - 0.80; p<0.01; I2=10%). Additionally, patients who received irreversible electroporation plus immunotherapy achieved a greater overall survival compared with irreversible electroporation alone (HR=0.52; 95%CI=0.37 - 0.73; p<0.01; I2=0%). The pooled results for CA 19-9 showed significantly lower levels in patients receiving irreversible electroporation and immunotherapy compared with those receiving irreversible electroporation alone (MD: -70.18U/L; 95%CI=-121.07 - -19.29; p<0.01; I2=98%). No significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events such as nausea and vomiting (OR=1.58; 95%CI=0.71 - 3.49; p=0.26; I2=0%) and gastroparesis (OR=0.88; 95%CI=0.23 - 3.40; p=0.85; I2=0%) was not observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Combined therapy using percutaneous irreversible electroporation and systemic immunotherapy offers a safe and effective treatment approach for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with irreversible electroporation potentially enhancing the efficacy of systemic immunotherapy in combined applications.

PROSPERO DATABASE REGISTRATION

ID CRD42024562216.

Address: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.; Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru.; Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.; UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL, United States.; Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.