Lucía Majano Díaz, Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Henar Núñez Rodríguez, Daniel Pérez Corte, Miguel Ángel de Jorge Turrión, Maria Pellisé, Julia Martínez Ocón, Fausto Riu Pons, José Santiago García, Eva Barreiro Alonso, Carlos Rodríguez Escaja, Andrés Santos Rodríguez, Ángel Cañete Ruiz, Alfonso Muriel, Javier Zamora, Beatriz Peñas García, Sofía Parejo Carbonell, Ana García García de Paredes, Elena Garrido Gómez, Julia López Cardona, Sergio López Durán, Marta Aicart-Ramos, Carla Senosiaín Lalastra, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Gandía, Irene García de la Filia, Rubén Sánchez Aldehuelo, Eduardo Tavío Hernández, Alba Martínez Sánchez, Beatriz Mateos Muñoz, Javier Martínez González, Jesús Donate Ortega, Elsa de la Fuente Briongos, Pilar Díez Redondo, Carolina Cerrella Cano, Leire Parapar Álvarez, Carmen Elisa Caceres Pieter, Maria Ojeda Remizova, Irene Gonzalez Silva, Ana Ferrer Blanco, Laura Sanroman Claros, Javier Tejedor-Tejada, Andrea Jiménez Jurado, Valeria Karina Calabuig Mazzola, Ignacio Berdial Cabal, Diego Leoz, Eva Rivas, Andrea Calvo, Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada, Diego de Frutos Rosa, Fátima Valentín Gómez, Paula Gutiérrez Landaluce, Raquel Marcé Colomet, Pablo Flórez Díez, Lorena Blanco García, Olegario Castaño Fernández, Rafael Ruiz Zorrilla López, Marina Eliana Millán Lorenzo, Eduardo López Fernández, María Sierra Morales, Pilar García Centeno, Isabel Maestro Prada, Enrique Vázquez-Sequeiros, Agustín Albillos Martínez
Journal: BMJ open 2026;16(3):e111695
PMID: 41916623
BACKGROUND
Colorectal polypectomy plays a crucial role in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. Postpolypectomy bleeding is the most common adverse event. Current European guidelines recommend a temporary suspension of anticoagulation for polypectomy, despite the lack of high-quality evidence supporting this practice. Recent data challenge this approach, suggesting that polypectomy without discontinuing anticoagulation is not only safe but may also reduce the incidence of thromboembolic events.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
This multicentre, prospective randomised, endoscopist-blinded, investigator-initiated, non-inferiority clinical trial aims to compare the safety of temporary interruption versus maintenance of anticoagulation during polypectomy for colorectal lesions. A total of 481 patients on oral anticoagulant treatment (either vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants), and scheduled for an elective colonoscopy for any indication, will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to each group. Colonoscopy and polypectomy procedures will be conducted by experienced endoscopists at 11 Spanish hospitals. The primary outcome is clinically significant postpolypectomy haemorrhage, while the secondary outcomes involve evaluating the risk of thromboembolic events and other procedural-related variables. Non-inferiority will be assessed in the per-protocol population using an adjusted absolute risk difference margin of 10%.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The study protocol was initially approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (approval number: 24/330-EC_M). According to Spanish legislation on clinical trials, approval by a single CEIm is sufficient for multicentre studies and is recognised by all participating centres. The decision of the approving ethics committee is therefore applicable to all study sites. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment.The results of this study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presentation at relevant national and international gastroenterology and endoscopy conferences.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT07185295.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Full Text Sources:
Medical:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.