Xianqin Zeng, Shifeng Zhong, Xifan Zheng, Zeming Li
Journal: The Nigerian postgraduate medical journal 2026;33(2):159-169
PMID: 41766261
OBJECTIVE
The objective was to assess whether amylase (AMY) and other laboratory parameters have a prognostic value for patients with Paraquat (PQ) poisoning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS THIS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FOLLOWED PRISMA GUIDELINES A COMPREHENSIVE LITERATURE SEARCH WAS PERFORMED IN MULTIPLE DATABASES TWO INVESTIGATORS INDEPENDENTLY EXTRACTED DATA ON STUDY CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY WAS ASSESSED USING THE NEWCASTLEOTTAWA SCALE
Standard mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the endpoints.
RESULTS
In total, 17 studies comprising 1673 patients were enrolled, 731 patients (43.69%) were defined as survivors, while 942 patients (56.31%) were considered non-survivors. The levels of AMY and plasma PQ were significantly higher in non-survivors when compared to subjects in the survival group. The white blood cell count, concentration of C-reactive protein, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, alanine aminotransferase and asparagine transaminase were significantly increased in the non-survivor group, while serum potassium, pH and PaCO2 were decreased in the non-survivor group. In addition, PaO2 values were similar between the two groups. Notably, heterogeneity was a key feature across the analyses: most primary and secondary prognostic indicators exhibited high to extreme heterogeneity (I² range: 0.0%-96.7%), with the highest heterogeneity observed for CRP (I²=96.7%) and PaO2 (I²=90.1%).
CONCLUSION
A lower level of AMY and plasma PQ in poisoning patients might have a good prognosis value.
Copyright © 2026 Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal.
Full Text Sources:
Miscellaneous:
Research Materials:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.