Phase I/II clinical trial of a melanoma vaccine targeting shared non-mutated antigens and a shared mutated BRAF neoantigen with an agonistic CD40 antibody (CDX-1140) plus TLR3 agonist (poly-ICLC).

Emily K Ninmer, Gina R Petroni, Brian R Gastman, Elizabeth M Gaughan, James M Isaacs, Kathleen Haden, Varinder Kaur, Nolan A Wages, Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock, Kelly T Smith, Paul Wright, Jennifer Bryant, Marya Dunlap-Brown, Jack A Engel, Stefan Bekiranov, Ileana S Mauldin, Thach-Giao Truong, Timothy N J Bullock, Craig L Slingluff

Journal: Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 2026;14(3):

PMID: 41775435

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients with high-risk melanoma who are unresponsive or intolerant to immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines may provide benefit with a favorable toxicity profile. CD4+ T cells provide essential help to dendritic cells (DCs) for optimal CD8+ T cell priming in the antitumor response, and induction of tumor-cognate CD4+ T cell responses may enhance vaccine efficacy. We report on a first-in-human approach to treat patients with high-risk melanoma using a vaccine composed of six non-mutated melanoma-specific helper peptides (6MHP) and a shared mutated BRAF-V600E neoantigen helper peptide (mBRAF) co-administered locally with a TLR3 agonist (poly-ICLC) and agonistic CD40 antibody (CDX-1140).

METHODS

Adults with high-risk melanoma arising from cutaneous, mucosal, or ocular primary sites who were rendered clinically free of disease after definitive treatment were enrolled to this nonrandomized phase I/II trial (NCT04364230) designed to assess safety and immunogenicity. Participants received vaccine (6MHP+mBRAF+poly-ICLC) with a dose-escalation allocation of CDX-1140 into the vaccine mixture at one of four dose levels (50, 200, 800, 3000 μg). Vaccines were administered at 3-week intervals for four doses. Primary endpoints were safety and peripheral CD4+ T cell response. Exploratory analysis to characterize the vaccine site microenvironment was performed.

RESULTS

Of 22 eligible participants, 11 (50%) had ocular melanoma. Sixteen (73%) received the maximum CDX-1140 dose. Toxicities were limited to grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events, with no dose-limiting toxicities reported. Peripheral CD4+ T cell responses to 6MHP were found ex vivo in six (27%, 95% CI 11% to 50%), including four with the maximum CDX-1140 dose. One had a durable and persistent T cell response to week 25. T cell responses to mBRAF did not meet criteria for positivity ex vivo, but one participant had a durable response after in vitro stimulation, with expansion of multifunctional Th1-polarized CD4+ T cells. Favorable immune-related changes were observed at the vaccine site, including CDX-1140-mediated increases in mature (DC-LAMP+) DCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The vaccine was safe, well-tolerated, and immunogenic. Optimization of vaccines that include agonistic CD40 antibody is needed to enhance immunogenicity. Induction of a multifunctional CD4+ T cell response to mBRAF supports targeting shared mutated neoantigens with melanoma vaccines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04364230.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.

Address: Department of Surgery/Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.; Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, California, USA.; Department of Medicine/Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Present Affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.; Department of Surgery/Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Cancer Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Department of Surgery/Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Present Affiliation: Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.; Cancer Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.; Department of Surgery/Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA [email protected].; Cancer Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.