Training pathways and formal curricula in robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Francesco Brucchi, Daqi Zhang, Simona Bertoli, Santo Colosimo, Gianlorenzo Dionigi

Journal: Journal of robotic surgery 2026;20(1):

PMID: 41733800

Abstract

The adoption of robotic platforms in bariatric and metabolic surgery has increased steadily, raising important questions regarding how surgeons are trained to safely acquire robotic skills. While structured and competency-based training models are increasingly adopted in other fields of robotic surgery, training approaches in robotic bariatric surgery remain less standardized. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify studies describing structured training pathways or formal curricula for robotic bariatric surgery. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched from inception without date restrictions. Eligible studies explicitly reported training programs, curricula, or educational pathways for robotic bariatric procedures. Learning curve analyses without a defined curriculum were excluded. Data were synthesized using a structured narrative approach. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Training models included stepwise intraoperative curricula, simulation-based and proficiency-driven programs, and modular educational interventions. Common components across curricula were simulation training, task decomposition, supervised progression, and defined competency benchmarks. Assessment strategies were heterogeneous and ranged from simulation-based proficiency thresholds to operative participation metrics and subjective workload measures. No study reported standardized certification or long-term competency outcomes. Structured training pathways for robotic bariatric surgery have been described and incorporate elements aimed at supporting safe skill acquisition. However, existing curricula remain heterogeneous and lack standardized assessment frameworks. Future efforts should focus on developing competency-driven and proficiency-based progression training models to support reproducible and safe adoption of robotic bariatric surgery.

© 2026. The Author(s).

Address: University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, Milan, 20122, Italy. [email protected].; Division of Surgery, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy. [email protected].; Division of Thyroid Surgery, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.; Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.; Obesity Unit and Laboratory of Nutrition and Obesity Research, Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.; Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.; Division of Surgery, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.