Artur Bednarczyk, Magnus Aurivillius, Mandeep Jassal, Mihir Shah, Ibrahim Raphiou, David Petullo, John Xu, Maria Heijer, Klementyna Sychowicz, Kathryn Collison, Carlos Silva, Jitendar Reddy, David Han, Ronald Goldwater, Michael Gillen, Mehul Patel
Journal: Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease 2026;20():17534666261417149
PMID: 41677208
BACKGROUND
Hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze (HFO-1234ze) is a next-generation propellant with 99.9% lower global warming potential (GWP) than hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a).
OBJECTIVES
We report systemic and lung exposure bioequivalence for budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) components with HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a.
DESIGN
These phase I, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 3-way cross-over trials in healthy adults included three phases (screening; three single-dose treatment periods with 3- to 7-day washouts; follow-up).
METHODS
Participants were randomized to four BGF inhalations (160/9/4.8 µg/actuation) with test (HFO-1234ze) or reference (HFA-134a) treatments in one of three sequences, with HFA-134a administered during two of the three treatment periods. For lung exposure, oral activated charcoal was administered before and after treatment. Bioequivalence was considered established if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) was within 80%-125% (or expanded limits, if appropriate) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUCinf; US approach only).
RESULTS
Bioequivalence criteria were met across BGF components. The 90% CI for the GMR was within 80%-125% (or expanded limits) for HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a, for systemic (GMR: Cmax, 85.41-99.29; AUClast, 95.74-102.48; AUCinf, 90.72-102.58) and lung (GMR: Cmax, 93.39-104.24, AUClast, 97.02-107.76; AUCinf, 101.45-112.22) exposure. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION
Total systemic and lung exposure to all BGF components met bioequivalence criteria for HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a, with no new or unexpected safety findings. The near-zero GWP HFO-1234ze propellant is a viable replacement for HFA-134a.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT05569421 (clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05569421) and NCT05477108 (clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05477108).
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.