Experiences, influencing factors, and perceived outcomes from physical literacy interventions: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Jaime Barratt, Hannah Goss, Noah Erskine, Maeghan James, Clemens Töpfer, Klaus Pfeifer, John Cairney, Johannes Carl

Journal: International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being 2026;21(1):2613973

PMID: 41545324

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study synthesised qualitative findings from physical literacy (PL) interventions, focusing on participants' experiences and perceived outcomes. It also explored the key factors influencing these experiences and outcomes to inform future PL interventions.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis was conducted using a meta-aggregative approach to review qualitative studies from a previously published systematic review (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42020188926). Studies were included if they: (i) reported results from a PL intervention, (ii) reported participant perceptions, and (iii) were published in English. Studies that reported only quantitative outcomes were excluded, and mixed-methods studies were eligible only if they contained extractable qualitative findings. The data were extracted, synthesised, and categorised using the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment, and Review of Information.

RESULTS

Following the ConQual approach, the overall quality, dependability, and credibility of the 12 included studies were scored as high. A total of 336 findings were aggregated into 95 sub-themes (i.e., categories), which were then categorised into 19 themes. As a result, three overarching themes (i.e., synthesised findings) were identified: program outcomes, factors influencing outcomes, and challenges with implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our synthesis highlights the holistic, context-sensitive nature of successful PL interventions, filling a notable gap in the predominantly quantitative PL literature. Tailoring programs to participant needs, proactively addressing logistical barriers, and continuing to foreground participant perspectives remain crucial for enhancing effectiveness and refining future intervention strategies.

Address: Department of Educational Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.; Health and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, The University of Queensland St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.; School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Whitehall, Dublin, Ireland.; Health and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, The University of Queensland St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.; School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, and the Queensland Centre for Olympic and Paralympic Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Institut of Sports Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.; Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.; Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Geelong, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.