Riding a Golf Cart Versus Walking: A Study on the Physiological and Performance Differences in Tournament Golf.

Amy O'Donnell, Andrew Murray, Adam Jones, James E Harrison, Alex Lindsay, Tony Bennett, Chris Bishop, Tim F Donovan, James P Morton, Carl Langan-Evans, Graeme L Close

Journal: European journal of sport science 2025;26(1):e70099

PMID: 41360681

Abstract

Golf demands sustained physical effort and effective fatigue management, especially in competitive play. Allowing players to ride golf carts in elite play has raised concerns about potential performance advantages, yet well-controlled studies are lacking. This study examined the effects of golf cart use on physiological, physical and cognitive outcomes in competitive golfers. Sixteen males (mean age: 21 ± 3 years; handicap: 2.3 ± 3.7) completed two randomised competitive rounds on a championship course (6587m; 19°C), either walking with a caddie or riding a golf cart. Physiological measures included activity energy expenditure (Actiheart), core temperature, heart rate and perceived exertion (0-100). Physical outcomes were step count, carry distance, clubhead speed, ball speed and muscle power. Cognitive workload (NASA-Task Load Index) was assessed post-round. The step count and activity energy expenditure were significantly higher for walking than using a golf cart (17,007 ± 1708 vs. 6274 ± 1111 steps; 880 ± 279 vs. 456 ± 155 kilocalories). Core temperature was higher for walking at holes 6, 12, and 18 (p = 0.022). The heart rate increased across the round when walking but decreased while using a cart (p < 0.01), and post-round exertion was higher for walking (41 ± 19 vs. 25 ± 14 and p < 0.001). Carry distance, clubhead and ball speed did not differ. NASA-Task Load Index subscales of physical demand and performance (reverse scored) were higher for walking. Relative to walking, golf cart use lowered internal physiological and external physical load, without impairing muscle power or shot performance. Cognitively, walking imposed higher physical strain and reduced perceived performance. Further research should explore whether these physiological, physical and cognitive outcomes impact performance across multiday tournaments.

© 2025 The Author(s). European Journal of Sport Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European College of Sport Science.

Address: Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.; Ladies European Tour, Buckinghamshire Golf Club, Denham Court Drive, Denham, UK.; PGA European Tour Health and Performance Institute, Virginia Water, UK.; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.; PGA European Tour Health and Performance Institute, Virginia Water, UK.; Medicine and Science, The R&A, St Andrews, UK.; Tournament Golf College, Cornwall, UK.; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.; European Disabled Golf Association (Medical and Scientific Department), Wassenaar, the Netherlands.; International Golf Federation (Disability and Inclusion Department), Maison du Sport International, Lausanne, Switzerland.; Faculty of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London, UK.; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.; PGA European Tour Health and Performance Institute, Virginia Water, UK.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.