Does e-cigarette nicotine strength influence substitution for combustible cigarettes?

Jeffrey S Stein, Allison N Tegge, Jeremiah M Brown, Kelsey M Curran, Warren K Bickel

Journal: Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2025;124(3):e70056

PMID: 41055893

Abstract

Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace, we examined the effects of e-liquid freebase nicotine strength (3-24 mg/mL) and e-liquid price (US$0.25-$1.00/mL) on behavioral economic substitution for cigarettes in dual cigarette/e-cigarette (n = 41) and exclusive cigarette (n = 40) users. Subjective effects of nicotine strength were also examined. All nicotine strengths served as a substitute for combustible cigarettes, with greater substitution observed in dual users. When analyzing e-liquid volume purchased (mL), nicotine strength did not influence substitution; however, when analyzing e-liquid nicotine purchased (mg), degree of substitution increased as a function of nicotine strength. Additionally, higher nicotine strengths reduced the volume and probability of e-liquid purchasing, increased cigarette demand, and produced less favorable subjective effects than lower strengths. Increasing e-liquid price reduced e-liquid purchasing and did not influence substitution. We conclude that nicotine strength does not robustly affect the degree to which e-liquid substitutes for cigarettes, as no effect was observed in analysis of the unit of purchase most relevant to real-world sales (volume). Instead, high-strength nicotine potentially reduces the appeal and probability of purchasing e-liquid. Future work should examine these effects in nicotine salt-based e-liquids compared with freebase nicotine (used here) and in choice contexts with concurrent access to different nicotine strengths.

© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Address: Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Addiction Recovery Research Center, Roanoke, VA, USA.; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.; Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Addiction Recovery Research Center, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.