Anton Risto, Pär Myrelid, Jonas Söderling, Ola Olén, Caroline Nordenvall
Journal: Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2025;27(9):e70234
PMID: 40958388
BACKGROUND
There are three reconstructive options after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC), ileal pouch anal anastomosis, ileorectal anastomosis and continent ileostomy. Less than 50% of UC patients in Sweden get bowel continuity after colectomy. The aim was to investigate the correlation between reconstructive volumes of the hospital performing the colectomy and the likelihood of reconstruction.
METHODS
From the Swedish National Patient Register, all ulcerative colitis patients subjected to colectomy between 1997 and 2020 were identified, and patient demographics, surgeries and hospital reconstructive volumes were extracted. Cox regression models of time from colectomy to reconstruction were performed, including age, sex, calendar time of colectomy, time from diagnosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and pelvic pouch volume in the models. The patients were divided into groups depending on the annual number of pelvic pouches performed at the hospital performing the colectomy: 0, 1-3, 4-7, >7.
RESULTS
Colectomy was performed in 4112 patients, 1932 (47%) patients were reconstructed. Restorative surgery was more common in high-volume versus low-volume units (62% vs. 38%). Ileorectal anastomosis was slightly more common than pelvic pouch (964 (50%) vs. 927 (48%)), but in high-volume units only 30% of the reconstructed patients received an ileorectal anastomosis. The chance of pelvic pouch increased with each volume category (HR: 1; 1.49; 1.79; 2.22 (p < 0.001)).
CONCLUSION
The likelihood of receiving pouch surgery depends on the hospital where the colectomy was performed, which must be considered in the future organization of UC-surgery.
© 2025 The Author(s). Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.