Functional assessment in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with darolutamide: results from the DaroAcT study.

Jeffrey S Wefel, Jorge Ortiz, Daniel J George, Alicia K Morgans, Tomasz M Beer, Neal D Shore, Shankar Srinivasan, Frank Verholen, Kerri Winters-Stone

Journal: The oncologist 2025;30(7):

PMID: 39450762

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) are approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer; however, some patients may experience symptoms and side effects that hinder their physical functioning. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) tests are used to assess physical functioning in older adults and are recommended assessments for patients with prostate cancer, despite lacking validation in this setting.

METHODS

DaroAct (NCT04157088) was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2b study designed to evaluate the effects of the ARI darolutamide (lead-in phase) and darolutamide vs enzalutamide (randomized phase) on physical functioning in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Only the lead-in phase, in which participants received darolutamide 600 mg twice daily, was completed. The TUG and SPPB tests were used to assess physical functioning.

RESULTS

The lead-in phase enrolled 30 participants. During 24 weeks of treatment, 8 (32.0%) of 25 evaluable participants exhibited clinically meaningful worsening in TUG from baseline (primary endpoint). At the week 24 visit, 5 (21.7%) of 23 participants had worsening in TUG time, and 8 (33.3%) of 24 participants had worsening in SPPB score. Because only 48% of participants had the same outcome on the TUG and SPPB tests, the study was terminated without initiating the randomized comparison.

CONCLUSION

Most participants showed no clinically meaningful worsening in physical functioning after 24 weeks of darolutamide treatment, but poor agreement between tests was observed. Tools to accurately and consistently measure the impact of ARIs on physical functioning in patients with CRPC are needed.

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.

Address: Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 98239, United States.; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Shool of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.; Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, United States.; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 98239, United States.; Division of Oncological Sciences, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.; Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.; Bayer Consumer Care, Basel, Switzerland.; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Whippany, NJ, United States.; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.