The Impact of Multidisciplinary Transitional Care Interventions for Complex Care Needs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Edwin Geleijn, Marike van der Leeden, Marike van der Schaaf, Romain Collet, Raymond Ostelo, Juul van Grootel, Suzanne Wiertsema, Mel Major, Johanna van Dongen, Elena Lazzari

Journal: The Gerontologist 2025;65(6):

PMID: 40040533

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions (MTCIs) ensure care coordination and continuity after hospital discharge while addressing (older) patients' complex care needs related to their physical, nutritional, cognitive, and/or psychological status. This study aimed to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize the current body of evidence investigating the effectiveness of such interventions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials assessing MTCIs' impact on readmissions, mortality, and health-related outcomes from inception to July 2024. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Risk of Bias-2 tool. Subgroup analyses assessed whether different intervention types affected outcomes differently. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and the credibility of subgroup analyses with the Instrument to evaluate the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses.

RESULTS

Forty-nine trials involving 25,566 patients were included. There was low certainty that MTCIs reduced readmissions (relative risk [RR] = 0.88; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] = 0.80 to 0.96) and high certainty for reduced mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.01). There was low to moderate certainty that MTCIs improved physical quality of life (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.54; 95% CI = -0.06 to 1.15), mental quality of life (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI = -0.08 to 0.96), patient satisfaction (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI = -0.14 to 1.12), and physical performance (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI = -0.11 to 1.10). Subgroup analysis revealed a larger and statistically significant effect on physical performance in more complex interventions (SMD = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.02 to 1.65).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that MTCIs can reduce readmissions and mortality while improving quality of life and physical performance. Further investigations should focus on tailoring MTCIs to specific contexts to maximize their impact.

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Gerontological Society of America.

Address: Faculty of Science, Department of Health Sciences, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Ageing, and Vitality, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Faculty of Science, Department of Health Sciences, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Faculty of Health, Department of Physical Therapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Ageing, and Vitality, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.