Effect of pharmacist interventions in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

Ellen Hopwood, Ffion Curtis, Kamlesh Khunti, Thomas J Wilkinson, Patrick Highton, Ashkon Ardavani, Priscilla Katapa

Journal: Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2025;40(5):884-907

PMID: 39384574

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists are uniquely placed with their therapeutic knowledge to manage people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data are limited regarding the impact of pharmacist interventions on economic, clinical and humanistic outcomes (ECHO).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions with pharmacist input was conducted, which included adults with a diagnosis of CKD, including those with and without kidney replacement therapy. Data were extracted on ECHO: economic (e.g. healthcare-associated costs), clinical (e.g. mortality) and humanistic (e.g. patient satisfaction) outcomes. Where appropriate, a random-effects model meta-analysis generated a pooled estimate of effect. A direction of effect plot was used to summarize the overall effects for clinical outcome domains.

RESULTS

Thirty-two RCTs reported a total of 10 economic, 211 clinical and 18 humanistic outcomes. Pharmacist interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements in systolic blood pressure and hemoglobin levels, but not in diastolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, creatinine and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Mixed findings were reported for clinical and economic outcomes, whilst pharmacist interventions resulted in an improvement in humanistic outcomes such as patient satisfaction and patient knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Findings showed pharmacist interventions had mixed results for various outcomes. Future studies should be more robustly designed and take into consideration the role of the pharmacist in prescribing and deprescribing, the findings of which will help inform research and clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022304902).

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.

Address: NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC-EM), Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.; Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group (LRIG), Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.