Pain Reduction in Linzagolix-Treated Patients With Uterine Fibroids: A Secondary Mediation Analysis of the PRIMROSE 1 and 2 Phase 3 Trials.

Sven Becker, Stefan P Renner, Satoshi Hori, Marie-Madeleine Dolmans, Jacques Donnez, Elke Bestel, Felice Petraglia, Francisco Carmona Herrera, Raluca Ionescu-Ittu, Julien St-Pierre, Mitra Boolell

Journal: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2025;132(9):1297-1306

PMID: 40326221

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Among women with uterine fibroids (UFs), we assess the extent to which the linzagolix effect on pain alleviation is explained by its effect on reducing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and fibroid volume (FV).

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis on the pooled data from two randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 trials.

SETTING

94 sites in the US (PRIMROSE 1 trial) and 95 sites in Europe/US (PRIMROSE 2 trial).

POPULATION

Women aged ≥ 18 years with ultrasound-confirmed UFs and HMB (n = 1012).

METHODS

Participants were randomised to linzagolix (100 mg and 200 mg, with and without hormonal add-back therapy) versus placebo. A post hoc mediation analysis was conducted on the pooled PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2 data. The effect of linzagolix versus placebo on pain reduction was divided into three components (effect explained by HMB reduction associated with linzagolix, FV reduction associated with linzagolix, and remaining [not yet explained] treatment effect), with proportions of each component reported.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The mediation analysis outcome was clinically significant pain reduction, defined as a change of ≥ 2 pain categories from baseline to Week 24 using the Numeric Rating Scale (pain categories: no pain (0), and mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), severe pain (7-10)).

RESULTS

In the mediation analysis, 28%-51% (depending on treatment arm) of linzagolix effect on pain reduction was explained by its effect on HMB reduction, while 2%-8% was explained by its effect on FV reduction. The residual proportion ranged between 44% and 67%, depending on treatment arm, and was statistically significant only in the linzagolix 200 mg without add-back therapy arm (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis showed that reductions in pain were significantly mediated by reductions in HMB (all doses) and FV (200 mg alone) in linzagolix-treated women with UFs. Further research is needed to identify additional mediating factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03070899 and NCT03070951.

© 2025 Theramex and The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.; Gynecology Research Laboratory, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Department of Gynecology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.; Gynaecology Department, Clinic Institute of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology (ICGON), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Clinical Experimental and Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Boeblingen Clinic, Hospital Sindelfingen-Böblingen, Böblingen, Germany.; STATLOG, Montreal, Canada.; Department of Medical Affairs, Theramex HQ Ltd, London, UK.; Société de Recherche Pour L'infertilité, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.