Gene Therapy With URO-902 (pVAX/) for the Treatment of Female Patients With Overactive Bladder and Urge Urinary Incontinence: Safety and Efficacy From a Randomized Phase 2a Trial.

Jingmei Lu, Salim Mujais, Kenneth M Peters, Ekene A Enemchukwu, Susan Kalota, Kaiser Robertson, Sijian Ge, Hanh Badger

Journal: The Journal of urology 2025;213(4):417-427

PMID: 39693268

Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed efficacy and safety of URO-902, an investigational gene therapy expressing the α subunit of the large-conductance Ca-activated K channel, in a phase 2a placebo-controlled trial in women with overactive bladder (OAB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women, age 40 to 79 years, with OAB and urge urinary incontinence who were refractory to OAB medications were randomized to single-dose URO-902 24 and 48 mg or placebo administered by intradetrusor injection via cystoscopy under local anesthesia. Efficacy end points included change from baseline to week 12 in mean daily micturitions, urgency episodes, urge urinary incontinence episodes, and patient-reported outcomes. Safety assessments included adverse events and postvoid residual urine volume.

RESULTS

Of 80 patients randomized (URO-902 24 mg, n = 26; URO-902 48 mg, n = 27; placebo, n = 27), 74 received treatment, and 67 reached week 24. At week 12, URO-902 24 and 48 mg were associated with significant improvement vs placebo in daily micturitions (least-squares mean change from baseline, -2.3 and -2.4 vs -0.8, respectively; least-squares mean difference [95% CI], ‒1.5 [‒2.7 to ‒0.3] and ‒1.6 [‒2.8 to ‒0.4], nominal = .017 and = .009, respectively). URO-902 48 mg was associated with significant improvements vs placebo in urgency episodes (‒3.4 vs ‒1.1; ‒2.2 [‒4.0 to ‒0.4]; nominal = .016) and percentage of Patient Global Impression of Change responders (58% vs 31%; nominal = .026). Among patients receiving URO-902 24 mg, URO-902 48 mg, and placebo, 46%, 54%, and 54%, respectively, experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly UTI (0%, 15%, 4%) and hematuria (6%, 8%, 8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase 2a trial, treatment with URO-902 was associated with improvements vs placebo in efficacy and patient-reported outcomes and was safe and well tolerated.

Address: Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.; Arizona Urology Specialists, Tucson, Arizona.; Chesapeake Urology, Hanover, Maryland.; Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc, Marlborough, Massachusetts.; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.; Department of Urology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.