Feasibility and effectiveness of a digital voice assistant for improving anti-osteoporosis medication adherence, and osteoporosis knowledge and attitudes, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A 12-month randomised controlled trial.

Belinda De Ross, Paul Jansons, Jakub Mesinovic, David Scott, Robin M Daly, Peter R Ebeling, Elena S George, Nicole Kiss, Eugene Gvozdenko, Melkamu Tamir Hunegnaw

Journal: Archives of osteoporosis 2025;20(1):43

PMID: 40202535

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Digital voice assistants (DVAs) are feasible for delivering a digital health intervention designed to improve osteoporosis self-management in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. However, the DVA intervention did not improve anti-osteoporosis drug adherence, nor did it enhance osteoporosis knowledge or attitudes in this population.

PURPOSE

To determine feasibility and effectiveness of a digital voice assistant (DVA) intervention for improving anti-osteoporosis medication adherence, and osteoporosis knowledge and attitudes, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

METHODS

This 12-month single-blinded, randomised controlled trial included 50 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis randomised to DVA (N = 25) or control (N = 25) for 6 months, followed by a 6-month follow-up period. DVA participants received an Amazon Alexa device that delivered osteoporosis education videos, medication reminders and interactive quizzes. Control participants received emails with links to osteoporosis information. Anti-osteoporosis medication possession ratio (MPR; acceptable adherence defined as ≥ 0.8) was determined using Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule data. Osteoporosis knowledge was measured using the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT) and medication attitudes were measured using the Adherence Evaluation of Osteoporosis Treatment (ADEOS-12) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age of participants was 64.3 ± 6.1 years and 6-month DVA intervention adherence (number of DVA sessions accessed) was 79.5% (95%CI: 73.9, 84.9). The proportion of participants with acceptable 12-month MPRs was similar between groups (control: 86.4% [95%CI: 77.0, 93.6]; DVA: 95.0% [95%CI: 88.4, 100.0], P = 0.34). Mean OKAT scores improved in both groups after both 6- and 12 months, but there were no significance between groups. Changes in mean ADEOS-12 scores did not differ between baseline and 6 months in DVA compared to control (0.61 [95%CI: - 0.80, 2.03]) but worsened post-intervention from 6 to 12 months (net difference: - 1.42 [95%CI: - 2.80, - 0.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

This DVA-delivered intervention achieved good adherence but did not improve medication adherence, osteoporosis knowledge, or attitudes compared with control. Future studies should target populations with poor adherence to anti-osteoporosis medication.

© 2025. The Author(s).

Address: Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. [email protected].; University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia. [email protected].; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.; Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.; Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.; Great Australian Pty Ltd, Keysborough, Australia.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.