Perceptions of sarcopenia in patients, health and care professionals, and the public: a scoping review of studies from different countries.

Christopher Hurst, Linda Errington, Avan A Sayer, Emma Grace Lewis

Journal: European geriatric medicine 2025;16(1):99-113

PMID: 39760925

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Perceptions of sarcopenia have rarely been explored, yet understanding these will be key for successful translation of sarcopenia research findings into meaningful benefits for patients and the public. This scoping review aimed to explore how sarcopenia is perceived amongst patients, health and care professionals (HCP), and the public in different countries.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases were searched from inception up to December 2023 with no geographical or language limitations. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed research of any design where the focus related to perceptions of sarcopenia. Studies using alternative descriptors only, such as "skeletal muscle weakness/loss" were excluded. Study characteristics were charted, and thematic synthesis conducted.

RESULTS

Following independent screening of 11,533 records, 20 articles were included in this review representing 19 countries. Five studies focused on patient perceptions, 11 investigated HCP, and four the public. Three key themes were identified: (1) Low awareness of sarcopenia-among all groups, its nature as a disease was contested. (2) The "know-do" gap in healthcare-even where knowledge among HCP existed, this had not translated into clinical practice, in part, due to perceptions of sarcopenia and its management. (3) Experiencing weakness-living with sarcopenia had physical and psychological sequalae.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

These findings reveal perceptions that may be contributing to the slow adoption of sarcopenia prevention, screening, diagnosis, and management. Addressing these areas has the potential to aid translation of sarcopenia research findings into improved clinical care and benefits for patients and the public.

© 2025. The Author(s).

Address: AGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. [email protected].; NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust and Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. [email protected].; AGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.; NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust and Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.; School of Biomedical Nutritional and Sport Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.