The impact of an interactive online informational and peer support application (app) for patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) on quality of life: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Marie Demian, Sahir Bhatnagar, Carmen Loiselle, Carol-Ann Vasilevsky, Erin Kennedy, Sami Chadi, Martha Chamdroka, Richard Garfinkle, Sarah Sabboobeh, Phyllis Zelkowitz, Allister Smith, Olivia Monton, Jeongyoon Moon, Carl Brown, Marylise Boutros, Julio F Fiore, Sender Liberman, Julie Savard

Journal: Surgical endoscopy 2025;39(2):1308-1317

PMID: 39779532

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) describes bowel dysfunction post-restorative proctectomy (RP) and is associated with poor quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an interactive online informational and peer support App on participants' QoL (primary outcome), LARS, and emotional distress (secondary outcomes).

METHODS

A multicentre, randomized, parallel-group trial was conducted across five Canadian colorectal surgery practices. Adult patients who: (1) underwent RP for rectal cancer and completed all treatment and (2) had major/minor LARS were included. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment or comparison group, stratified by hospital site and years post-RP. The treatment group had access to the App for a period of 6 months, and the comparison group received a booklet containing the same educational material as the App. The primary outcome was change in global QoL (EORTC-QLQ-C30) from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. Per-protocol and intention to treat analysis were performed, controlling for a priori selected variables (sex, time from end of treatment).

RESULTS

Of the 101 enrolled participants, 10 individuals were lost to follow-up and 91 completed the study. Participants were well-balanced in terms of baseline characteristics, QoL and bowel dysfunction. Among the 45 App users, median log-in per person was 21, with 30 (66.7%) participants meeting criteria for adequate app usage. On intention to treat analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in QoL in the App group. On the per-protocol analysis, where only participants who met adequate App usage criteria were included in the treatment group, the group reported statistically significant improvement in QoL (β 9.5, 95% CI 4.6,14.6) and LARS (β - 2.7, 95%CI - 5.1,- 0.2) scores following App usage.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter randomized controlled trial support that, when adequately used, an interactive online informational and peer support App has the potential to improve QoL of rectal cancer survivors living with LARS post-RP.

© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Address: McGill University, Montreal, Canada.; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.; Western University, London, Canada.; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.; Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.; Perioperative Care and Outcomes Research (PCOR) Lab, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, R2-104, Montrea, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.; Department of Oncology and Ingram School of Nursing, Centre for Nursing, Research, CIUSSS Centre-Ouest, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; McGill University, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33301, USA. [email protected].

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.