Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Non-surgical Treatments with or without Exercise for Diastasis Recti Abdominis in Postpartum Women: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Wen-Chieh Wu, Chien-Yi Chan, Chun-Yin Huang, Ming-Fen Lee, Pei-Yu Wu, Yu-Kang Tu, Wen-Hong Wu, Hsuan Lin

Journal: Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2025;55(4):937-951

PMID: 39878918

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA), commonly occurring in postpartum women, is not only an aesthetic issue but is also highly associated with functional impairments. Various conservative treatment modalities have been employed in clinical practice to alleviate DRA. However, the comparative efficacy of these non-surgical treatments for improving the inter-recti distance (IRD) remains to be determined.

AIM

This current network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare the efficacy and acceptability of different non-surgical treatments with or without exercise for improving DRA in postpartum women.

METHODS

This NMA adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. ClinicalKey, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies up to April 2024. The analysis included studies that met the following criteria: (1) postpartum women diagnosed with DRA defined as an IRD greater than 2 cm; (2) intervention: any non-surgical treatments for at least 2 weeks; (3) comparator: no-treatment control; and (4) outcome: changes in IRD and acceptability. The relative efficacy between the non-surgical treatments tested and the probability of treatments were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs comprising 1195 participants aged from 18 to 45 years old were included. The forest plot revealed that exercise coupling with neuromuscular electrical stimulation systems (NMES) [mean difference (MD) - 1.12 cm, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.66 to - 0.58], acupuncture (MD - 0.81 cm, 95% CI - 1.54 to - 0.08), corset (MD - 0.65 cm, 95% CI - 1.24 to - 0.06), and exercise alone (MD - 0.48 cm, 95% CI - 0.80 to - 0.16) led to significant reductions in IRD compared with control. Further, the treatment ranking indicated that the combination of NMES with exercise has the highest probability (91.0%) of being the best treatment for reducing IRD, followed by acupuncture with exercise (71.1%). Treatments combined with exercise demonstrated better rankings for reducing IRD than individual treatments without exercise. Acceptability did not significantly differ between the groups.

LIMITATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This NMA encountered limitations due to participant variability, differing measurement methods, and sparse data, necessitating careful interpretation of findings regarding postpartum DRA interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA suggests NMES combined with exercise as the best treatment tested for DRA in postpartum women.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42024541345.

© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Address: Department of Nutrition, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.; Ma Kuang United Clinics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.; Institute of Health Data Analytics and Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.; Health Data Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.; MinYou Chinese Medicine Clinic, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.; Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Nutrition, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. [email protected].

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.