Sodium fluorescein video Angiography-Assisted clipping of intracranial Aneurysms: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Jason Ellis, Christian Ferreira, Jhon E Bocanegra-Becerra, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, David Langer, Leonardo Januário Campos Cardoso, Rodrigo Twardowski Scherer, Christian Ken Fukunaga, Ahmet Günkan, Yafell Serulle

Journal: Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 2025;134():111081

PMID: 39879726

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ensuring aneurysm exclusion while maintaining vessel patency is crucial during intracranial aneurysm clipping. Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard for intraoperative vascular imaging, some centers have reported using fluorescein sodium video angiography (FNa-VA). However, a synthesis of these findings is still lacking. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FNa-VA in identifying aneurysm remnants and vessel stenosis post-clipping.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting on FNa-VA for intraoperative aneurysm clipping assessment. We assessed the rate of mis-clippings identified by FNa-VA, false negatives, and procedure-related side effects. A diagnostic assessment analyzed FNa-VA's sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Single proportion analysis with 95% confidence intervals under a random effects model was used, with heterogeneity examined via I2 and leave-one-out analysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 280 patients with 311 aneurysms were included. FNa-VA identified mis-clippings that eluded visual inspection in 11.94 % of cases (95 % CI: 5.83-18.05, I = 59 %), with false negatives in 2.15 % (95 % CI: 0-5.13, I = 44 %). It has demonstrated a sensitivity of 50 % and a specificity of 93 %, with PPV and NPV of 52 % and 93 %, respectively. Procedure-related side effects were yellow skin and green urine for 2-3 days following the procedure.

CONCLUSION

FNa-VA may reduce the risk of mis-clipping during aneurysm surgery, however, it is still prone to false negatives and should be considered a complementary tool rather than used alone. Additionally, it appears to have a safe profile with only mild and transitory side effects.

Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Faculty of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.; School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; Department of Medicine, FMABC University Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Academic Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.; Department of Radiology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.