Nathaniel Roth, Matthieu Doyen, Fabien Hyafil, Laetitia Imbert, Véronique Roch, Mathieu Perrin, Marine Claudin, Pierre-Yves Marie, François Rouzet, Telma Sprauel, Kaya Doyeux, Yechiel Lamash, Renata Chequer
Journal: Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2025;49():102226
PMID: 40258438
BACKGROUND
Attenuation artifacts affect the analysis of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging, especially in the right coronary artery (RCA) territory, although computed tomography (CT)-based attenuation corrections minimize this issue. This study aims to assess stress-rest [Tc]sestamibi cadmium zinc telluride (CZT)-SPECT reconstructed using deep-learning-based attenuation correction (DLAC) maps according to coronary artery territory and with comparison to [Rb]rubidium-positron emission tomography (Rb-PET) conventionally reconstructed with CT-based attenuation correction.
METHODS
We compared stress-rest [Tc]sestamibi CZT-SPECT reconstructed without (i.e., standard (SD-SPECT)) and with DLAC (DLAC-SPECT) in 84 patients at risk of attenuation artifacts (overweight individuals and women) with no previous history of coronary artery disease (CAD), and who also had Rb-PET and, when indicated, coronary angiography.
RESULTS
In 74 very low CAD-risk patients: (i) the stress segmental activity values were homogeneous between the three coronary artery territories with DLAC-SPECT and Rb-PET but exhibited a marked reduction in the RCA territory with SD-SPECT (69.1% ± 8.2% vs 81.2% ± 7.1% and 77.7% ± 8.5% for DLAC-SPECT and Rb-PET, respectively, both P < .001), and (ii) the absolute value of the difference between the rest and stress segmental activities was higher in the RCA territory with SD-SPECT (5.13% ± 4.04%) than with DLAC-SPECT (4.21% ± 3.24%) and Rb-PET (3.92% ± 3.08%, both P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS
When utilizing DLAC maps for reconstruction of [Tc]sestamibi CZT-SPECT, there is no more drop in the RCA territory uptake with lower fluctuations in stress-to-rest activity, aligning closely with the results observed using Rb-PET in the same patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT01679886 on clinicaltrials.gov.
Copyright © 2025 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.