Jiayin Li, Laiyan Wu, Yu Li, Cong Cheng, Yujuan Yao, Jianjun Qin, Junqiao Zhou, YuZhou Wu
Journal: International journal of biological macromolecules 2025;304(Pt 1):140738
PMID: 39920934
N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine-quinone (6PPD-Q) formed from the oxidation of N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD), have garnered worldwide concern for the acute toxicity to various organisms. Binding behaviors and their interaction differences between PEP and 6PPD/6PPD-Q are investigated by multi-spectral methods, computer simulation studies and enzymatic activity assay. The fluorescence static quenching mechanism indicated that stable PEP-6PPD/6PPD-Q complexes were spontaneously formed drove by van der Waals forces and hydrogen, these binding behaviors change polarity of the microenvironment around residues and distort enzyme structure. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy support that both 6PPD and 6PPD-Q induced changes in the secondary structure and ASA of active center amino acids of PEP. Meanwhile, the effect of hydrophobic forces on the stability of 6PPD/6PPD-Q-PEP complexes should not be ignored on the basis of molecular docking results. The greater fluorescence quenching in PEP-6PPD-Q system (25.36 %), compared to the PEP-6PPD system (22.62 %), is due to more fluorescent groups binding to 6PPD-Q via van der Waals forces and other intermolecular interactions. The inhibition of PEP activity by 6PPD and 6PPD-Q under the experimental conditions ranged from 2.38 %-16.75 % and 6.54 %-21.49 %, respectively, inhibition types are all mixed inhibition.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Miscellaneous:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.