A qualitative evaluation of the effectiveness of behaviour change techniques used in the Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles for Diabetes (HEAL-D) intervention.

S Harding, C Rivas, Louise M Goff, A P Moore

Journal: BMC public health 2025;25(1):568

PMID: 39934762

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is up to three times more common in people of Black African and Black Caribbean heritage living in the UK, compared to their White British counterparts. Structured education is the cornerstone of care but is less successful for people from minority ethnic groups. Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles for Diabetes (HEAL-D) was developed to support diabetes self-management in people of Black African and Caribbean heritage living with T2D in the UK. The intervention was designed using COM-B/behaviour change wheel methodology to specify the theory of change. In a process evaluation study, we explored how the selected behaviour change techniques (BCTs) supported behaviour change in the intervention.

METHODS

Focus groups and interviews were conducted with participants who were randomised to receive the HEAL-D intervention in a feasibility trial. A topic guide directed discussions to explore experiences of HEAL-D, key learnings and impact, and behaviour change; the interviews gave the opportunity to probe further the focus group themes and areas requiring clarification. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Framework analysis was used to explore how the selected BCTs supported behaviour change in those attending HEAL-D.

RESULTS

Thirty-six participants took part in one or both activities (44% Black African, 50% Black Caribbean, 6% Mixed race; 61% female, 83% first-generation; mean age 59.5 years, SD 10.02). Participants reported increased physical activity, reduced carbohydrate portion size and engagement in weight monitoring behaviour. BCTs to increase social opportunity (social comparison, social support) and overcome motivational barriers (credible sources and modelling) were effective in addressing cultural barriers relating to diet, stigma and health beliefs. BCTs to develop capability (demonstration, instruction, information on health consequences) were effective because of the cultural salience of the developed components. Less impactful BCTs were problem solving, graded tasks, goal setting, and feedback on outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

BCTs in the HEAL-D intervention were effective in supporting behaviour change, particularly those promoting social opportunity, as normative cultural habits and beliefs can conflict with diabetes self-management guidance. In addition, lifestyle interventions should include opportunity for experiential learning alongside culturally salient information provision.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

number: NCT03531177, May 18th 2018.

© 2025. The Author(s).

Address: University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.; King's College London, Franklin Wilkins Building, London, SE1, UK.; Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.