Single mandibular implant study - impact on dietary habits after 5 years of observation in patients with immediate and delayed loading protocols.

Elfriede Fritzer, Stefan Wolfart, Matthias Kern, Sarah M Blender, Christoph Behrendt, Stefanie Kappel, Ralf J Kohal, Ralph G Luthardt, Nadine Frfr V Maltzahn, Daniel R Reissmann, Nicole Passia

Journal: Clinical oral investigations 2024;28(10):571

PMID: 39365479

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Single midline implants in the edentulous mandible can be used to support existing complete dentures to improve patients' satisfaction and masticatory efficiency. The impact on patients' dietary habits and the influence of the loading protocol of the implants was the subject of this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective randomized clinical trial, edentulous patients with existing complete dentures in both jaws were treated with a single midline implant in the mandible. In group A, the implants were loaded immediately, in group B the loading was delayed after three months. Patients were asked to report on their nutritional intake before implant placement and 12, 24 and 60 months after loading using a standardized two-part questionnaire.

RESULTS

Nutritional intake regarding the frequency of consumption of the requested food items did not change significantly during the 60-months study period, regardless of the loading protocol. In contrast, the second part of the questionnaire revealed that after 60 months, there was a significant decrease in avoidance of food, that had a coarse and hard texture in both groups. This significant decrease was observable in the group A in the first 12 and 24 months and in the group B after 60 months.

CONCLUSION

A change in the patients' dietary habits due to the insertion of a single midline implant in the mandible to support the existing complete denture cannot be observed, independently to the loading protocol.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Improving the chewing efficiency by single midline implants in the edentulous mandible does not lead to a change in dietary habits.

© 2024. The Author(s).

Address: Center of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany. [email protected].; Department of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, Greifswald University Hospital, Greifswald, Germany.; Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Center for Clinical Studies, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.; Department of Prosthodontics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.; Center of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.; Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Hannover, Hannover, Germany.; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.; Department of Prosthodontics and Material Sciences, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.; Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.; Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.