Comparative Efficacy of Current Topical Treatments for Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Pivotal Clinical Trials Evaluating Corneal Staining Outcomes.

Stephen Pflugfelder, Ahmad Fahmy, Masih Ahmed, Anara Serikbaeva, Fang-Wei Tsao

Journal: Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2025;41(6):293-304

PMID: 40293775

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder characterized by disruption of tear film homeostasis, resulting in ocular surface inflammation and damage. Although several Food and Drug Administration-approved topical treatments are available, direct comparisons of their efficacy and safety are complicated by variability in study designs and corneal staining grading scales. This review systematically evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of topical therapies approved in the United States, focusing on anti-inflammatory and semi-fluorinated alkane (SFA)-based therapies. A systematic literature review identified 12 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6,984 patients with varying severity of DED eligible for inclusion, with 8 providing data suitable for quantitative meta-analysis and 5 for exploratory regression analysis. Meta-analysis indicated that cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA showed the most significant early improvement (within ≤4 weeks) in total corneal fluorescein staining, outperforming other treatments. Exploratory regression analysis further supported these findings, demonstrating that cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA had the fastest and most consistent reduction in corneal staining, with the steepest improvement slope and strong predictability ( = 0.871). Safety analyses highlighted improved local tolerability for SFA-based therapies compared with traditional anti-inflammatory treatments, notably lower instillation site discomfort for both cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA (2.5%-9.9%) and perfluorohexyloctane (≤1%) vs. other cyclosporine formulations. SFA-based therapies, especially cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA, demostrated robust efficacy in improving signs of DED with superior tolerability profiles compared to traditional anti-inflammatory treatments. These findings support the role in effectively managing ocular surface inflammation and optimizing treatment strategies in DED.

Address: Minnesota Eye Consultants, Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA.; Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.; Harrow Inc, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.