Effects of atmospheric pressure change during flight on insulin pump delivery and glycaemic control of pilots with insulin-treated diabetes: an in vitro simulation and a retrospective observational real-world study.

Ka Siu Fan, Graham A Roberts, Stuart J Mitchell, Declan Maher, Ewan J Hutchison, Monique Borg Inguanez, Gillian L Garden, Vivienne Lee, Victoria Edwards, Antonios Manoli, Kenneth M Shaw, Chantal Mathieu, David L Russell-Jones, Fariba Shojaee-Moradie, Simon R Heller, Bruce R King, Julia K Mader, Brian M Frier, Gerd Koehler, Megan Paterson

Journal: Diabetologia 2024;68(1):52-68

PMID: 39496965

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Glycaemic control and clinical outcomes in diabetes are improved by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Atmospheric pressure changes during flights may affect insulin delivery from pumps and cause unintended metabolic consequences, including hypoglycaemia, in people with type 1 diabetes. The present report evaluates both hypobaric flight simulation and real-world data in pilots using insulin pumps while flying.

METHODS

In the flight simulation part of this study, an in vitro study of insulin pumps was conducted in a hypobaric chamber, de-pressurised to 550 mmHg to mimic the atmospheric pressure changes in airliner cabins during commercial flights. Insulin delivery rates and bubble formation were recorded for standard flight protocol. Insulin infusion sets, without pumps, were tested in a simulated rapid decompression scenario. The real-world observational study was a 7.5-year retrospective cohort study in which pre- and in-flight self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) values were monitored in pilots with insulin-treated diabetes. Commercial and private pilots granted a medical certificate to fly within the European Union Aviation Safety Agency approved protocol and receiving insulin either by pump or multiple daily injections (MDI) were included.

RESULTS

In the flight simulation study, full cartridges over-delivered 0.60 U of insulin during a 20 min ascent and under-delivered by 0.51 U during descent compared with ground-level performance. During emergency rapid decompression, 5.6 U of excess insulin was delivered. In the real-world study, seven pilots using CSII recorded 4656 SMBG values during 2345 h of flying across 1081 flights. Only 33 (0.7%) values were outside an acceptable safe range (5.0-15.0 mmol/l [90-270 mg/dl]). No clinically significant fall in the median SMBG concentration was observed after aircraft ascent and no in-flight SMBG values were within the hypoglycaemic range (<4.0 mmol/l [<72 mg/dl]). Compared with pilots receiving MDI therapy, pilots using CSII recorded more SMBG values within the acceptable range (99.3% vs 97.5%), fewer values in the low red range (0.02% vs 0.1%), fewer in-flight out-of-range values (0.2% vs 1.3%) and maintained stricter glycaemic control during flight.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Ambient pressure reduction during simulated flights results in bubble formation and expansion within insulin cartridges. This causes unintended delivery of small insulin doses independent of pre-determined delivery rates and represents the maximum amount of insulin that could be delivered and retracted. However, in vivo, pilots using CSII in-flight did not experience a fall in blood glucose or episodes of hypoglycaemia during these atmospheric pressure changes and the use of insulin pumps can be endorsed in view of their clinical benefits.

© 2024. The Author(s).

Address: Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.; Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes Research, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, UK.; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.; Department of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, John Hunter Children's Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.; Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.; Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.; QinetiQ, Cody Technology Park, Farnborough, UK.; The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.; Medical Department, Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation House, Crawley, UK.; Irish Aviation Authority, Dublin, Ireland.; Department of Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.; Irish Aviation Authority, Dublin, Ireland.; CRF-C University College Cork, HRB Clinical Research Facility Cork, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.; Diabetes Research Group, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.; Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.; Austrocontrol, Vienna, Austria.; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. [email protected].; Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes Research, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, UK. [email protected].; Medical Department, Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation House, Crawley, UK. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.