Asymmetric genome merging leads to gene expression novelty through nucleo-cytoplasmic disruptions and transcriptomic shock in Chlamydomonas triploids.

Olivier De Clerck, Yves Van de Peer, Lucas Prost-Boxoen, Quinten Bafort, Antoine Van de Vloet, Fabricio Almeida-Silva, Yunn Thet Paing, Griet Casteleyn, Sofie D'hondt

Journal: The New phytologist 2024;245(2):869-884

PMID: 39501615

Abstract

Genome merging is a common phenomenon causing a wide range of consequences on phenotype, adaptation, and gene expression, yet its broader implications are not well-understood. Two consequences of genome merging on gene expression remain particularly poorly understood: dosage effects and evolution of expression. We employed Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a model to investigate the effects of asymmetric genome merging by crossing a diploid with a haploid strain to create a novel triploid line. Five independent clonal lineages derived from this triploid line were evolved for 425 asexual generations in a laboratory natural selection experiment. Utilizing fitness assays, flow cytometry, and RNA-Seq, we assessed the immediate consequences of genome merging and subsequent evolution. Our findings reveal substantial alterations in genome size, gene expression, protein homeostasis, and cytonuclear stoichiometry. Gene expression exhibited expression-level dominance and transgressivity (i.e. expression level higher or lower than either parent). Ongoing expression-level dominance and a pattern of 'functional dominance' from the haploid parent was observed. Despite major genomic and nucleo-cytoplasmic disruptions, enhanced fitness was detected in the triploid strain. By comparing gene expression across generations, our results indicate that proteostasis restoration is a critical component of rapid adaptation following genome merging in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and possibly other systems.

© 2024 The Author(s). New Phytologist © 2024 New Phytologist Foundation.

Address: Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.; Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.; College of Horticulture, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.