Speech Therapy Combined With Cerebrolysin in Enhancing Nonfluent Aphasia Recovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke: ESCAS Randomized Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND

Stroke-induced aphasia significantly impacts communication and quality of life. Despite the standard treatment being speech and language therapy, outcomes vary, highlighting the need for additional therapies. Cerebrolysin, a neuroprotective and neurotrophic agent, has shown potential in stroke management. This study addresses the notable gap in research about the combined use of Cerebrolysin and speech therapy, evaluating their synergistic potential in the treatment of aphasia.

METHODS

The ESCAS trial (The Efficacy and Safety of Cerebrolysin in the Treatment of Aphasia After Acute Ischemic Stroke), a prospective, randomized-controlled, double-blinded study was conducted in 2 Romanian stroke centers. Participants included those with left middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke and nonfluent aphasia, enrolled 3 to 5 days poststroke. Inclusion criteria were right-handedness and Romanian as the mother tongue. Participants received Cerebrolysin or a placebo combined with speech and language therapy in 10-day cycles over 3 intervals, and evaluations were done at baseline, 30, 60, and 90 days respectively. The main outcome measure was Western Aphasia Battery for language function. Changes at days 30, 60, and 90 compared with baseline were quantified, and the effect estimand used was the difference in means between groups. Secondary outcome measurements were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for neurological deficit, the modified Rankin Scale for global disability, and the Barthel Index for activities of daily living.

RESULTS

Out of 132 enrolled patients, 123 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 120 in the per-protocol analysis. Overall, both groups showed improvement at subsequent visits compared with the baseline for Western Aphasia Battery and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The Cerebrolysin group showed greater improvements in Western Aphasia Battery (visit 4 mean increase of 35.579±16.316 [95% CI, 31.289-39.869] points; <0.001) compared with the placebo group (20.774±12.486 [95% CI, 17.603-23.945] points; <0.001), a difference in means of 14.805 (95% CI, 9.521-20.089) points (<0.001). The Cerebrolysin group also showed significant improvements (higher decreases) in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores compared with the placebo group (2.085 [95% CI, 1.076-3.094] points; <0.001). Safety analysis raised no concerns (number of patients with adverse events =0.105, number of adverse events per patient =0.134). Additionally, the Cerebrolysin group showed greater improvements in functional independence (Barthel Index) and a trend toward reduced disability (modified Rankin Scale) compared with the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebrolysin combined with speech and language therapy offers promising potential for enhancing recovery in poststroke nonfluent aphasia. Significant improvements were observed in language and neurological deficits, underscoring the importance of adjunctive therapies in nonfluent aphasia rehabilitation. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to fully establish the efficacy of this combination therapy.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN54581790.