Robert A Sykes, Richard I S Good, Arvind Sood, Angie Ghattas, Keith E Robertson, C Aengus Murphy, Andrew P Apps, J Paul Rocchiccioli, Peter J McCartney, Richard A Brogan, Andy Jong, Anna L Kamdar, Conor Bradley, David Carrick, Ross J McGeoch, Damien G Collison, Daniel T Y Ang, Alex McConnachie, Colin Berry, Francis R Joshi, Hany Eteiba, Brian O'Rourke, M Mitchell Lindsay, Aadil Shaukat, David A MacDougall
Journal: Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2025;18(6):e015058
PMID: 40308206
BACKGROUND
Intravenous adenosine induces stable myocardial hyperemia for coronary microvascular function testing. Iodinated radiographic contrast media induce transient, submaximal hyperemia. We assessed the feasibility, diagnostic value, and potential cost-effectiveness of contrast-derived indices of microvascular function.
METHODS
Coronary flow reserve, index of microvascular resistance, and microvascular resistance reserve were assessed using a diagnostic guidewire. Intracoronary bolus thermodilution injections were performed at rest, immediately after an 8-mL bolus of iohexol, repeated after a second 8-mL bolus, and during intravenous adenosine infusion. Receiver operating characteristic analyses assessed the discriminatory ability of the contrast-derived indices (contrast-derived coronary flow reserve, contrast-derived index of microcirculatory resistance, contrast-derived microvascular resistance reserve) to detect abnormal adenosine-derived indices (coronary flow reserve <2.0, index of microvascular resistance ≥25, and microvascular resistance reserve <2.1).
RESULTS
Among 106 coronary arteries from 93 patients (median age 63 years; 62% women; 13% with diabetes), 88% of assessments were undertaken in the left anterior descending artery. Median fractional flow reserve was 0.88 (interquartile range, 0.85-0.92). Contrast-derived coronary flow reserve <2.0 (area under the curve 0.81; sensitivity 67%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 40%, negative predictive value 92%), contrast-derived index of microcirculatory resistance >47 (area under the curve 0.82; 80%, 79%, 60%, 91%), and contrast-derived microvascular resistance reserve <1.9 (area under the curve 0.82; 67%, 89%, 35%, 97%) were best for predicting their adenosine-derived counterpart indices. There was good correlation on repeatability testing from the second contrast bolus. A hybrid approach reduced adenosine use by 40%, saving $30 800 (USA) or £8000 (UK) per 1000 vessels assessed.
CONCLUSIONS
Contrast-derived indices have high specificity and negative predictive value, enabling rapid exclusion of microvascular dysfunction. This method is feasible, clinically useful and cost-saving compared with routine adenosine testing.
REGISTRATION
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04674449.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.