Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Kelemu Tilahun Kibret, Benjamin J Cowling, Joseph E Blais, Peng Wu, Yonatan M Mesfin

Journal: The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2024;79(9):2119-2131

PMID: 38817046

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir among vaccinated and unvaccinated non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19.

METHODS

Observational studies of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir compared to no antiviral drug treatment for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults with data on vaccination status were included. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Research Database and medRxiv for reports published between 1 January 2022 and 8 November 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization or mortality up to 35 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR) and risk differences (RD) were separately estimated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

We included 30 cohort studies on adults treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 462 279) and molnupiravir (n = 48 008). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir probably reduced the composite outcome (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.55-0.70; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty) with no evidence of effect modification by vaccination status (RR Psubgroup = 0.47). In five studies, RD estimates against the composite outcome for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were 1.21% (95%CI 0.57% to 1.84%) in vaccinated and 1.72% (95%CI 0.59% to 2.85%) in unvaccinated subgroups.Molnupiravir may slightly reduce the composite outcome (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.67-0.85; I2 = 32%; low certainty). Evidence of effect modification by vaccination status was inconsistent among studies reporting different effect measures (RR Psubgroup = 0.78; HR Psubgroup = 0.08). In two studies, RD against the composite outcome for molnupiravir were -0.01% (95%CI -1.13% to 1.10%) in vaccinated and 1.73% (95%CI -2.08% to 5.53%) in unvaccinated subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among cohort studies of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is effective against the composite outcome of severe COVID-19 independent of vaccination status. Further research and a reassessment of molnupiravir use among vaccinated adults are warranted.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023429232.

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Address: School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administration Region, Hong Kong, China.; Immunity & Global Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI), Parkville, VIC, Australia.; School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administration Region, Hong Kong, China.; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administration Region, Hong Kong, China.; Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administration Region, Hong Kong, China.; Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.; School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administration Region, Hong Kong, China.; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administration Region, Hong Kong, China.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.