Jiao Ma, Ting Zhao, Jiayu Zhang, Jia Deng, Chunyin Zhang
Journal: Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine 2025;28(1):44-60
PMID: 40188448
OBJECTIVE
Gallium-68-labeled fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (Ga-FAPI) has been developed for positron emission tomography (PET) and proved to be a promising imaging agent. It has shown good diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of various solid tumors, including head and neck cancers (HNC). This study conducted a meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) and Ga-FAPI in HNC, summarized the clinical evidence of Ga-FAPI for HNC, and compared the diagnostic sensitivity of the two imaging agents in the primary and metastatic lesions of HNC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed/ Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from built to 31 January 2023. Studies on patients with HNC underwent paired F-FDG and Ga-FAPI were included. Literature screening, full text review and data extraction were performed by 2 investigators. The risk of bias was examined with the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test sensitivity was performed by a random-effect model and displayed by a forest plot.
RESULTS
A total of 507 studies were comprehensively retrieved, and 11 studies, 297 patients were selected for the systematic review and 9 studies for meta-analysis. Two hundred and nine patients selected for initial staging and 88 patients for recurrence. Pooled sensitivity at initial stage was conducted. Based on primary lesions, the sensitivity were F-FDG 0.95 (0.81-0.99) vs Ga-FAPI 0.99 (0.90-1.00). For lymph node metastases, based on patients, the sensitivity were F-FDG 0.99 (0.77-1.00) vs Ga-FAPI 0.92 (0.68-0.98); For distant metastases, based on patients, the sensitivity were F-FDG 0.82 (0.03-1.00) vs Ga-FAPI 0.92 (0.59-0.99).
CONCLUSION
Gallium-68-FAPI has great potential in the diagnosis of HNC and has similar diagnostic value with F-FDG. While there is much overlap in the performance (as measured by sensitivity) of these two agents but a trend may favor Ga-FAPI over F-FDG for detection of primary tumor and distant metastases. Therefore, in the diagnosis and evaluation of head and neck cancers, the combination of Ga-FAPI and F-FDG can be considered according to the individual situation.
Full Text Sources:
Medical:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.