Personalized interventions for behaviour change: A scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions.

Christopher J Armitage, Lis Cordingley, John McBeth, Ting-Chen Chloe Hsu, Pauline Whelan, Julie Gandrup

Journal: British journal of health psychology 2024;30(1):e12766

PMID: 39542743

Abstract

PURPOSE

Examine the development, implementation and evaluation of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in behaviour change and evaluate the quality of intervention reporting.

METHODS

A scoping review of JITAIs incorporating mobile health (mHealth) technologies to improve health-related behaviours in adults. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO using terms related to JITAIs, mHealth, behaviour change and intervention methodology. Narrative analysis assessed theoretical foundations, real-time data capturing and processing methods, outcome evaluation and summarized JITAI efficacy. Quality of intervention reporting was assessed using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist.

RESULTS

Sixty-two JITAIs across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, substance use, sexual behaviour, fluid intake, treatment adherence, social skills, gambling behaviour and self-management skills were included. The majority (71%) aimed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability and/or usability. Supporting evidence for JITAI development was identified in 46 studies, with 67% applying this to develop tailored intervention content. Over half (55%) relied solely on self-reported data for tailoring, and 13 studies used only passive monitoring data. While data processing methods were commonly reported, 44% did not specify their techniques. 89% of JITAI designs achieved full marks on the TIDieR checklist and provided sufficient details on JITAI components. Overall, JITAIs proved to be feasible, acceptable and user-friendly across behaviours and settings. Randomized trials showed tailored interventions were efficacious, though outcomes varied by behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

JITAIs offer a promising approach to developing personalized interventions, with their potential effects continuously growing. The recommended checklist emphasizes the importance of reporting transparency in establishing robust intervention designs.

© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

Address: Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; The NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.; School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.