Comparing Right-Sided Colon Adenoma and Serrated Polyp Miss Rates With Water Exchange and CO 2 Insufflation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kuan-Chieh Fang, Chun-Chao Chang, Chih-Wei Tseng, Jui-Hsiang Tang, Chi-Liang Cheng, Yen-Lin Kuo, I-Chia Su, Yu-Hsi Hsieh, Felix W Leung, Yi-Ning Tsui, Bai-Ping Lee, Ke-Yun Zou, Yun-Shien Lee

Journal: The American journal of gastroenterology 2025;120(7):1615-1623

PMID: 39471473

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers primarily occur in the right-sided colon because of missed adenomas and serrated polyps (SPs). Water exchange (WE) improves cleanliness and visibility of the right-sided colon. We hypothesized that WE could reduce the right-sided colon adenoma (rAMR) and SP miss rate (rSPMR) compared with standard colonoscopy.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 386 colonoscopy patients to insertion with either WE or CO 2 insufflation. During the first withdrawal, polypectomies were performed up to the hepatic flexure. A second endoscopist, blinded to the insertion technique, re-examined the right-sided colon. The miss rate was determined by dividing the number of additional adenomas or SPs by the total number detected in both examinations. The primary outcome was the combined rAMR and rSPMR.

RESULTS

WE significantly decreased the combined rAMR and rSPMR (22.2% vs 32.2%, P < 0.001) and rSPMR alone (22.5% vs 37.1%, P = 0.002) compared with CO 2 insufflation, but not rAMR (21.8% vs 29.8%, P = 0.079). In addition, WE significantly increased the detection of SP per colonoscopy (SP per colonoscopy) in the right-sided colon (0.95 ± 1.56 vs 0.50 ± 0.79, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ≥2 SPs in the right-sided colon were an independent predictor of rSPMR (odds ratio, 3.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.89─6.38), along with a higher right-sided colon Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.32─0.94).

DISCUSSION

The significant reduction in rSPMR and increase in right-sided colon SP per colonoscopy suggest that colonoscopy insertion using WE is a valid alternative to CO 2 insufflation (clinical trial registration number: NCT04124393).

Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.

Address: Division of Gastroenterology, Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.; School of Medicine , Tzu Chi University , Hualien , Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology, Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Biotechnology, School of Health Technology, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.; Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, California, USA.; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA .
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.